Ron Marz on immigration and Trump's visit to Britain
3 Comments Published by Avi Green on Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 1:34 PM.
Here's two more of Marz's never-ending political tweets, with one attacking the US government over children being brought illegally into the USA:
And he buys into a Daily Beast article, no less, despite how revolting and awful their "coverage" is. But as this Breitbart article reveals, many of the illegal interlopers are actually leaving their own children with the authorities:
And then, when the Hill reports Trump feels "unwelcome" in Britain because of the hostile leftist crowd, Marz says:
And I guess it's also the point London has such a huge crime rate that skyrocketed ever since Sadiq Khan assumed role of city mayor? Or that Theresa May's proven she's no Margaret Thatcher after she took steps to sabotage Brexit? None of which matter to Marz, alas, not even the fact there are British supporting Trump. Social cohesion doesn't register on the radars of these leftist phonies, unfortunately, nor does a wish for independence without having to put up with the awful EU. Sigh.
If you're gonna kidnap kids, you might as well make some ransom, right? https://t.co/PmR9x8m3FE— Ron Marz (@ronmarz) July 11, 2018
And he buys into a Daily Beast article, no less, despite how revolting and awful their "coverage" is. But as this Breitbart article reveals, many of the illegal interlopers are actually leaving their own children with the authorities:
Many Central American migrants slated for deportation are choosing to leave their own children behind in U.S. government shelters, says an official at the Department of Homeland Security.This article also notes that a lot of the illegals may not even be the parents of the children involved, and here's one report from Texas of a woman who wasn't the mother of 3 children she had in tow. More confirmation comes from Daily Wire and Daily Caller. So sad Marz wants to believe it's all just an evil conservative/Republican conspiracy to do more harm than good. What's stunning is how, whether or not these are the biological parents, they don't give a damn about the children and are willing to abandon them far from home.
“We’re seeing many of these [migrant] parents who have been removed decline to take their child,” said Matthew Albence, the Executive Associate Director of Enforcement and Removal Operations division at U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
And then, when the Hill reports Trump feels "unwelcome" in Britain because of the hostile leftist crowd, Marz says:
That's kind of the point, stupid. https://t.co/KN5Uz94g4s— Ron Marz (@ronmarz) July 13, 2018
And I guess it's also the point London has such a huge crime rate that skyrocketed ever since Sadiq Khan assumed role of city mayor? Or that Theresa May's proven she's no Margaret Thatcher after she took steps to sabotage Brexit? None of which matter to Marz, alas, not even the fact there are British supporting Trump. Social cohesion doesn't register on the radars of these leftist phonies, unfortunately, nor does a wish for independence without having to put up with the awful EU. Sigh.
Labels: Europe and Asia, moonbat writers, politics
According to opinion polls this month, about two thirds of Britons think Donald is a bad or a terrible president; about 11per cent have a favourable view of him. He is even more unpopular in Britain than he is in the U. S.
British opinion polls have been irrelevant to Americans since 1776.
The post says that there are British supporting Trump; the British opinion polls put that claim in perspective.
Before Mr Trump became involved, there was prosecutorial discretion as to how border-crossers should be treated. People travelling with children not their own (if there were any) could be treated differently from people travelling with their own kids. Trump removed discretion; all kids had to be removed and incarcerated separately, whether infants or teenagers, whether biological kids or not. This was done without any planning and created chaos, overburdened a system that was not capable of handling or even keeping track of that many people, and greatly enriched a lot of already-wealthy and fairly incompetent but well connected service providers at the expense of the public treasury.