The Billy Ireland museum in Ohio is celebrating a century of women's cartooning
6 Comments Published by Avi Green on Friday, November 22, 2019 at 3:27 AM.
You may notice how today, there's a lot of Orwellian SJWs who intentionally obscure the past history of women writing and drawing comics, and act as though those they do take notice of are something entirely new. Well now, the Smithsonian magazine's site announced the Billy Ireland Cartoon Library & Musuem at Ohio's university has an exhibition set up for hosting a century's worth of women in the art of cartooning:
For now, this exhibit in Ohio is something PC advocates would do well to take a look at, and realize women working cartooning is nothing new at all, and recognize that the art form shouldn't be monopolized by social justice identity politics.
Nina Allender saw herself as a painter. But after women’s rights activist Alice Paul visited her in 1913, she shifted focus, beginning a lengthy tenure as a cartoonist for the Congressional Union for Woman Suffrage’s flagship publication, The Suffragist. The painter-turned-cartoonist’s creations depicted suffragists as stylish young women patiently waiting for their rights—a portrayal starkly contrasted by anti-suffrage cartoons that caricatured activists as frumpy and nagging. Allender’s work was instrumental in building public support for the 19th Amendment, which banned voting discrimination on the basis of sex upon its ratification in August 1920.Something today's PC pundits won't take a serious look at, to recognize that there have been women in art, comics and otherwise, for over a century now. Not even how there have been black and Asian contributors, such as:
To commemorate the centennial of this landmark event, Ohio State University’s Billy Ireland Cartoon Library & Museum is hosting an exhibition titled “Ladies First: A Century of Women’s Innovations in Comics and Cartoon Art.” Per the museum’s website, the show draws on the experiences of the many female artists who have shaped the genre to trace its evolution from political cartoons to newspaper comic strips, underground “comix” and graphic novels.
“Part of our goal was to really look at how women were pushing comics and cartoon art forward, not just the fact that women made comics,” exhibition co-curator Rachel Miller tells Columbus Alive’s Joel Oliphint. “We wanted to think about, ‘What are the different ways in which this medium has benefited from women who are making comics?’”
During the 1940s, Jackie Ormes became the first African-American woman cartoonist to have her work distributed nationally. She even licensed a line of upscale dolls modeled on Patty-Jo, one of the two African-American sisters featured in her “Patty-Jo ‘n’ Ginger” comic strip. [...]So even women of color specializing in comics and cartooning is nothing new at all. But most certainly is overlooked in a politically correct environment intent on undermining artistic merit. I know that cartoonists like Cathy Guisewite, Tarpe Mills and Lynn Johnston are cited in the exhibit, but I'd also like to know if writers like Laurie Sutton are included, recalling she'd written several Adam Strange tales in 1980-81, published as backups in Green Lantern at the time. IMO, writers of comics and cartoons should be highlighted too, since scripting bears significance just as much as artwork.
For now, this exhibit in Ohio is something PC advocates would do well to take a look at, and realize women working cartooning is nothing new at all, and recognize that the art form shouldn't be monopolized by social justice identity politics.
Labels: comic strips, exhibitions, libraries, museums
It was the "Orwellian sjws" and "pc pundits" who brought these forgotten cartoonists back to remembrance and print.
They were forgotten because comics were almost legislated out of existance after World War 2.
They were also forgotten because what they worked on was largely forgotten. No one liked their work enough to write about it or form fan clubs around it. When Romance comics disappeared women forgot about it. They moved on. They didn't care about the people who worked on them.
There is no point in remembering people simply for their surface traits. They should be remembered because they made something that is good.
This exhibit proves that there was no conspiracy to keep minorities out of comics.
And no, interest and talent in making comics is not evenly distributed among all groups of people.
Herman Melville and Moby Dick, Zora Neale Hurston and Their Eyes Were Watching God, Henry Roth and Call It Sleep, Robert E Howard and Conan, 'Kenneth Robeson' and Doc Savage, were all forgotten for a generation or more and later revived. All these stories are literary or adventure fiction canon now.
In comics, Green Lantern and the Flash and the X-Men were all cancelled because the public stopped being interested in them and the public moved on. They were revived later on. No comics were legislated out of existence after World War II; it was that the circulation figures dropped for the superhero stories after the war ended; the fad was over and the public moved on.
Sometimes you look to the past and find quality work that was set aside for a time.
"This exhibit proves that there was no conspiracy to keep minorities out of comics."
Because women are a minority of the population?
The exhibit includes a black female artist, Jackie Ormes, but her comic strips and panels were all published in black newspapers. George Herriman had to pass as white in order to be published in the mass circulation newspapers. You can count on one hand the number of identified black artists who worked in American comic books in the 1940s and 1950s (Matt Baker, Andre Leblanc, Alvin Hollingsworth).
Blacks had newspapers then? It's funny how the necessity to trigger white guilt for present political gain has mis-represented the past.
"Blacks had newspapers then?..."
So you are blaming your ignorance of history on a white liberal conspiracy?