The Four Color Media Monitor

Veteran filmmaker Martin Scorsese, whose latest movie, Killers of the Flower Moon, is premiering, was interviewed by Gentleman's Quarterly, and both the journalist and Scorsese revived his worries about the bad influence the major Marvel movies could have on everybody's perception of what moviemaking is all about. Though his citation of a certain other filmmaker involved in comics movies dampens the impact:

Scorsese is often cast as a retrograde defender of how things used to be, in part because of his work with the Film Foundation, a nonprofit he helped found and which has since preserved and restored hundreds of films, but it’s not exactly that simple. He believes that movie theaters are not dying, precisely. “I think there will always be theatrical, because people want to experience this thing together,” Scorsese said. “But at the same time, the theaters have to step up to make them places where people will want to go and enjoy themselves or want to go and see something that moves them.”

Here I suggested to Scorsese that the movie theaters could show only the films that Hollywood actually made, and therein might lie the problem—that if Hollywood makes nothing but comic book and franchise movies, and certain segments of the audience don’t want to see those films, then nothing is going to get them to a movie theater. I feel bad about having done this, since Scorsese’s skeptical comments about Marvel and comic book films in the past have attracted a lot of vitriol, and…here I am, inviting more vitriol for Martin Scorsese. Please complain to me and not him.

But he does see trouble in the glut of franchise and comic book entertainment that currently makes up much of what you can see in a theater. “The danger there is what it’s doing to our culture,” Scorsese said. “Because there are going to be generations now that think movies are only those—that’s what movies are.”

I think people already think that.

“They already think that. Which means that we have to then fight back stronger. And it’s got to come from the grassroots level. It’s gotta come from the filmmakers themselves. And you’ll have, you know, the Safdie brothers, and you’ll have Chris Nolan, you know what I mean? And hit ’em from all sides. Hit ’em from all sides, and don’t give up. Let’s see what you got. Go out there and do it. Go reinvent. Don’t complain about it. But it’s true, because we’ve got to save cinema.” Cinema could be anything, Scorsese said; it didn’t just have to be serious. Some Like It Hot—that was cinema, for instance. But: “I do think that the manufactured content isn’t really cinema.”

Again, you don’t need to say this.

“No, I don’t want to say it. But what I mean is that, it’s manufactured content. It’s almost like AI making a film. And that doesn’t mean that you don’t have incredible directors and special effects people doing beautiful artwork. But what does it mean? What do these films, what will it give you? Aside from a kind of consummation of something and then eliminating it from your mind, your whole body, you know? So what is it giving you?”

Scorsese needn't be too concerned by now. The Marvel movies are largely in decline, having succumbed to the pagan deities of wokeness, and the DC movies have easily fared worse, because WB was clueless how to handle them (and they've become just as plagued with wokeism). But that's an interesting way of looking at things - manufactured AI has taken the place of science fiction cinema, and there is a valid concern simultaneously that new generations are going to think comics adaptations is all their is to movies, though that's likely because filmmakers and marketers are clueless to boot, and don't know how to convince the audiences to check out their stuff too.

But why specifically Chris Nolan being somebody to object to too many comics movies? He was practically the driving force behind at least a few of them over a dozen years ago, having helmed the 3 Batman movies of the times, and IIRC, had production credit on Man of Steel by Zack Snyder. Scorsese, in his advanced age, is sure missing quite a bit. Make what you will of Nolan, but it's doubtful he'd speak out against a genre or theme he was instrumental in moving ahead, and influencing where it'd arrive now.

Labels: dc comics, history, marvel comics