I myself had been reading Spider-Man for about twenty years -- and had written Spider-Man for four of those years -- when Marvel decided that Pete and Mary Jane should marry. Right around that time, Jim Salicrup -- who was then the editor of the Spider-Man titles -- offered me work on SPECTACULAR SPIDER-MAN. That was during a period when no one else at Marvel would even return my phone calls, and I needed the work. But I regretfully had to turn Jim down. I saw the marriage as so wrong-headed that I didn't want to be a regular part of it.It's certainly sad to read that Stern, a writer/editor whom I'd long admired, balked at writing Spectacular Spider-Man just because of the marriage. And then he may have been one of the writers who brought Clark Kent and Lois Lane to the alter years later. Honestly, I can't see where he gets off by belittling the Spider-Marriage, so his logic is very peculiar indeed.
Because if we're going to try and stop the misuse of our favorite comics and their protagonists by the companies that write and publish them, we've got to see what both the printed and online comics news is doing wrong. This blog focuses on both the good and the bad, the newspaper media and the online websites. Unabashedly. Unapologetically. Scanning the media for what's being done right and what's being done wrong.
Monday, November 24, 2008
Roger Stern depresses me
Roger Stern recently gave an interview to Comicon's Pulse, where he said: