Saladin Ahmed exploits Stan Lee's past projects for his own leftist agendas
9 Comments Published by Avi Green on Tuesday, May 21, 2019 at 9:58 AM.
Somebody who sure isn't grateful to the late Lee is now taking advantage of past licensed projects he may or may not have greenlighted to suit his own dark political positions from a modern perspective:
It would appear Ahmed's trying to exploit an unwise move Lee might've made in the 1970s just to suit his own ungrateful agenda. I noticed somebody on the thread saying people who claim Marvel "only recently went woke" didn't read earlier stuff. But as it so happens, I was aware of this for years already, and don't try to pretend it didn't happen, as I did mention a time or two in past posts. And what do I think? Let me be clear. I am sad Lee, if he really did give this project his seal of approval, associated his company with such a disgusting organization founded by Margaret Sanger, a woman who harbored a bias against blacks, which is a slap in the face to the anti-racism positions he advocated in his time. Sure, PP may not have been as extreme in the 70s as they are today, but that doesn't make their past platforms any more tasteful.
Furthermore, it doesn't take a genius to figure Ahmed's not grateful to Stan for anything, and it wouldn't be shocking if people like him just write such drivel in attempts to convince Lee's defenders that their favorite hobbies are "sexist and racist", and should be abandoned to people like him to exploit. Well here's what I have to say: if he thinks this item is going to discourage folks like myself from admiring Lee through all his ups and downs, he's throughly mistaken. Mainly because it's clear he's not doing this out of genuine appreciation for Lee in any category. Furthermore, if you know where to look, there are comics stories out there where pregnancies take place (Liz Allen's son Normie, named after Osborn Jr. in Spider-Man, and Stephanie Brown giving birth in an issue of Robin during the 90s), and usually are looked upon with admiration. Which isn't exactly what Ahmed's doing himself. It's a terrible shame he's exploiting a now deceased guy's archives to suit his own agenda, rather than just make the case himself in his own words.
Anyway, Ahmed posted more tweets supporting abortion:
Yeah, "safe, legal". Keep going, please. And, he has more to say about elections:
He clearly doesn't think liberals ever worked in front of or behind the scenes to enshrine their own agendas at the expense of cohesion, and his anti-conservative bias is predictably galling.
What makes him so obsessed with supporting abortion? It's amazing he hasn't gotten around exploiting Simone Veil's pushing for legalizing abortion in France during the time Valery Giscard d'Estaing was president in the 70s. Something I thought was atrocious in the extreme. He even posted the following:
And here, he's acting like everybody thinks white supremacy is a thing of the past. A man who already attacked Jewish Stan Lee's Israeli counterparts, which includes Gal Gadot, and doesn't seem particularly worried about Jews/Israelis falling victim to them, as tragically occurred of recent in Pittsburgh and San Diego's Poway district. And he's exploiting those cases he has just to pretend Islamofascism's not a major issue, even though it still reigns supreme in many places. It's a disgrace C.B. Cebulski continues to let him write anything for Marvel, but of course, let's not forget Sana Amanat likely also plays a part in making sure Ahmed still gets any jobs with them.
Spidey knows what's up (https://t.co/gOqqLlLXyN) pic.twitter.com/GPIkuZ3jes— Saladin Ahmed (@saladinahmed) May 15, 2019
never ever forget that Stan Lee had Peter officially promote Planned Parenthood sex ed pamphlets pic.twitter.com/Yr1jkf9hxI— Saladin Ahmed (@saladinahmed) May 15, 2019
before the right wing managed to demonize PP... pic.twitter.com/LTI8DwCTNd— Saladin Ahmed (@saladinahmed) May 15, 2019
It would appear Ahmed's trying to exploit an unwise move Lee might've made in the 1970s just to suit his own ungrateful agenda. I noticed somebody on the thread saying people who claim Marvel "only recently went woke" didn't read earlier stuff. But as it so happens, I was aware of this for years already, and don't try to pretend it didn't happen, as I did mention a time or two in past posts. And what do I think? Let me be clear. I am sad Lee, if he really did give this project his seal of approval, associated his company with such a disgusting organization founded by Margaret Sanger, a woman who harbored a bias against blacks, which is a slap in the face to the anti-racism positions he advocated in his time. Sure, PP may not have been as extreme in the 70s as they are today, but that doesn't make their past platforms any more tasteful.
Furthermore, it doesn't take a genius to figure Ahmed's not grateful to Stan for anything, and it wouldn't be shocking if people like him just write such drivel in attempts to convince Lee's defenders that their favorite hobbies are "sexist and racist", and should be abandoned to people like him to exploit. Well here's what I have to say: if he thinks this item is going to discourage folks like myself from admiring Lee through all his ups and downs, he's throughly mistaken. Mainly because it's clear he's not doing this out of genuine appreciation for Lee in any category. Furthermore, if you know where to look, there are comics stories out there where pregnancies take place (Liz Allen's son Normie, named after Osborn Jr. in Spider-Man, and Stephanie Brown giving birth in an issue of Robin during the 90s), and usually are looked upon with admiration. Which isn't exactly what Ahmed's doing himself. It's a terrible shame he's exploiting a now deceased guy's archives to suit his own agenda, rather than just make the case himself in his own words.
Anyway, Ahmed posted more tweets supporting abortion:
ʕ•ᴥ•ʔﾉ♡ ABORTION IS A HUMAN RIGHT ʕ•ᴥ•ʔﾉ♡— Saladin Ahmed (@saladinahmed) May 16, 2019
(please help those fighting on the ground for access to abortion in Alabama https://t.co/U16EDFJlgc)— Saladin Ahmed (@saladinahmed) May 16, 2019
always remember that, for decades, most Americans have supported access to safe, legal abortion— Saladin Ahmed (@saladinahmed) May 16, 2019
always remember that this is a deliberate, programmatic attempt to normalize regression
(to be clear, it would be a right whether or not most Americans supported it, but the lie of their broad support matters -- they really are vastly outnumbered)— Saladin Ahmed (@saladinahmed) May 16, 2019
Yeah, "safe, legal". Keep going, please. And, he has more to say about elections:
this is why we CANNOT AFFORD to enshrine presidential elections as the place where we invest all our energy/hope— Saladin Ahmed (@saladinahmed) May 16, 2019
the far right has long understood that this fight happens on a dozen different fronts, and it's past time we caught uphttps://t.co/IdFC19LexG
this doesn't mean preidential elections 'don't mean anything' or that this next one isn't hugely important, of course!— Saladin Ahmed (@saladinahmed) May 16, 2019
but they've been thinking about county executives and districting and under-the-radar legislative whittling and presence at clinics and we need to as well
He clearly doesn't think liberals ever worked in front of or behind the scenes to enshrine their own agendas at the expense of cohesion, and his anti-conservative bias is predictably galling.
New Zealand, 1972 https://t.co/5y99FUvS3B pic.twitter.com/2Ep4kmGrdw— Saladin Ahmed (@saladinahmed) May 17, 2019
What makes him so obsessed with supporting abortion? It's amazing he hasn't gotten around exploiting Simone Veil's pushing for legalizing abortion in France during the time Valery Giscard d'Estaing was president in the 70s. Something I thought was atrocious in the extreme. He even posted the following:
White American men are shooting up their own schools on a regular basis and still fantasize that Arabs are the villains— Saladin Ahmed (@saladinahmed) May 17, 2019
THIS is why it's so important to me to depict us as heroes https://t.co/jJhweVddIv
And here, he's acting like everybody thinks white supremacy is a thing of the past. A man who already attacked Jewish Stan Lee's Israeli counterparts, which includes Gal Gadot, and doesn't seem particularly worried about Jews/Israelis falling victim to them, as tragically occurred of recent in Pittsburgh and San Diego's Poway district. And he's exploiting those cases he has just to pretend Islamofascism's not a major issue, even though it still reigns supreme in many places. It's a disgrace C.B. Cebulski continues to let him write anything for Marvel, but of course, let's not forget Sana Amanat likely also plays a part in making sure Ahmed still gets any jobs with them.
Labels: Europe and Asia, islam and jihad, marvel comics, misogyny and racism, moonbat writers, politics, Spider-Man, terrorism, violence
Muslim radical advocating legal abortion for the infidels. Sounds about right.
"and doesn't seem particularly worried about Jews/Israelis falling victim to them, as tragically occurred of recent in Pittsburgh and San Diego's Poway district."
Ahmed did speak out about the Poway shooting:
https://www.baaz.com/trending/story/5cc4ffee24f673869498dcfb
saying - albeit in the language of intersectionality - that an attack on Jews was an attack against all minorities.
" Furthermore, if you know where to look, there are comics stories out there where pregnancies take place (Liz Allen's son Normie, named after Osborn Jr. in Spider-Man, and Stephanie Brown giving birth in an issue of Robin during the 90s), and usually are looked upon with admiration."
Planned Parenthood is not against birth! They are about giving people choices about whether or not to conceive or give birth. They give advice about fertility treatments for couples who are having trouble conceiving. They help people have babies. There is nothing contrary to Planned Parenthood in a story looking upon birth with admiration.
" They are about giving people choices "
That's progressive spin and it's crap.
People already have choices. You can choose to have have sex with effective birth control, or you can choose not having sex until you are ready to have a baby. What PP is all about is slutting around with out consequences - except to your unborn baby whom you destroy.
That's the truth.
Planned Parenthood is about having sex with effective birth control. Where do you think people learn about effective birth control?
Where my wife and I learned about birth control:
1. From the doctor.
2. From sex ed in school.
3. From books.
4. From the internet.
5. From our family.
Result- no baby. PP isn't necessary, absolutely not worth $500 million/yr in taxpayer's dollars for chopping up baby parts and selling them to research firms.
Here: educate yourself ...
http://www.gosnellmovie.com/about/
"Where do you think people learn about effective birth control?"
Planned Parenthood is not responsible for all sex education in the United States, you moron.
Planned Parenthood is the largest provider of abortions but they claim that abortions are only 3% of what they provide.
They claim that they just provide "preventive services and screenings, including contraception, testing for sexually transmitted infections, pap smears and breast exams. " As if these services are DENIED to women outside PP clinics. This may be true in the Bible Belt of the U.S. but I'm sure women can get The Pill, STD rests, and pap smears OUTSIDE of Planned Parenthoood clinics. What Planned Parenthood advocates for tells us what they are really about.
https://twitter.com/nowthisnews/status/1130534401748525056
If PP provides more than abortions on demand, they need to promote that reality instead defending abortion all the time.
As someone in the 'Bible Belt', I'd like to inform you that these services are NOT denied to women here, at least in the area I live.
So what other government projects do you want destroyed Mr. Bee?