Maybe Ant-Man is irredeemable...
But that doesn't mean they had to say so in the title of this new series that's come out. And yet, they did it.
Here's the problem: it sounds almost like a satire, which really doesn't suit the past history of Ant-Man and the Wasp when you take into consideration Hank's assault on her in 1981.
Nevertheless, why do I get the idea that I'd be more interested in reading this than the All-New Atom over at DC?
Here's a review from Rokk's Comic Book Revelution of the first issue. So far, it looks like there may not be any ant-army featured. That's something that the writers of the Avengers downplayed ever since the 1980s, if not discarded altogether.
Here's the problem: it sounds almost like a satire, which really doesn't suit the past history of Ant-Man and the Wasp when you take into consideration Hank's assault on her in 1981.
Nevertheless, why do I get the idea that I'd be more interested in reading this than the All-New Atom over at DC?
Here's a review from Rokk's Comic Book Revelution of the first issue. So far, it looks like there may not be any ant-army featured. That's something that the writers of the Avengers downplayed ever since the 1980s, if not discarded altogether.
Labels: Avengers, marvel comics
