More comments by creators about Paris bloodbath
Here's some more comments by creators about the jihad in Paris. We'll start first with those who, though leftist they may be, say something decent:
Okay, that's respectable enough. But, if they still hold fast to ultra-leftist standings on Islam and immigration, then these can't be taken at face value.
Now, for some of the usual disappointments. For example, if we determine a writer's persona by what he retweets, then here's a screenshot to check:
Busiek retweeted some of the most laughable apologia possible, which comes unglued when the birdbrain who wrote that junk blames right-wingers for everything. And Busiek then proceeds to make everything worse when he says:
Sarcasm or not, I am not amused by his petty swipes at Trump, no matter how weak I already find some of Trump's approach as it is. More hugely disappointing efforts to divert attention from pressing issues and worry about accepting in "refugees" whom I doubt they'd ever let into their own houses despite their stances.
He should take a good look at himself, because he later retweeted some more apologia for Islam, like this same nonsense Busiek did about IS wanting to create "Islamophobia". And again, without ever bothering to acknowledge the exact verses inside the Koran.
Unfortunately, Diggle's also retweeted apologia like this junk and this too:
I sure don't take this Diggle's statements at face value. What we really need is a story about infiltrators who intend evil and how to defeat them.
The best way to be smarter is to research the Koran/Hadith. Then he'll realize what Islamic State is motivated by. Otherwise, Marz's statement becomes meaningless.
I wonder if that's what Conway thinks of any French politician/citizen now opposed to letting in the invaders?
So he's using the UK Guardian as a channel for his ultra-leftist belief that ISIS is not exploiting the refugee crisis in Europe for their venomous goals? What a disgrace. Somebody else said:
And that, alas, is just the problem with the otherwise pathetic, potentially overrated Gaiman.
I get the feeling Seeley's drawing a moral equivalence between ALL religions, and won't make distinctions between good and bad. It brings to mind this report on how leftists blame all religion, and cannot tell the difference between one ideology or another. That's not the way to solve anything.
Here's also one more by a freelance editor named Will Dennis:
So he too thinks there's no difference between good and bad religions? I'm afraid that's pretty sloppy too.
Wow, Parisians showing extraordinary courage, strength and compassion.— GAIL SIMONE (@GailSimone) November 14, 2015Just hearing the news from Paris. Thoughts are with friends in that part of the world...— Cully Hamner (@CullyHamner) November 13, 2015Thoughts and love with France. Horrifying.— Scott Snyder (@Ssnyder1835) November 14, 2015Okay, that's respectable enough. But, if they still hold fast to ultra-leftist standings on Islam and immigration, then these can't be taken at face value.
Now, for some of the usual disappointments. For example, if we determine a writer's persona by what he retweets, then here's a screenshot to check:
I’m sure the Syrian refugees already living in Texas are going to have a wonderful time, full of acceptance, in the coming weeks.— Kurt Busiek (@KurtBusiek) November 17, 2015Donald Trump thinks we should buy land in Syria for refugees to live on. Because no one would mess with them there. That’d be trespassing.— Kurt Busiek (@KurtBusiek) November 17, 2015Sarcasm or not, I am not amused by his petty swipes at Trump, no matter how weak I already find some of Trump's approach as it is. More hugely disappointing efforts to divert attention from pressing issues and worry about accepting in "refugees" whom I doubt they'd ever let into their own houses despite their stances.
Wrecked by the news coming out of Paris. Infuriated by the stupidity of some people tweeting about it.— Greg Rucka (@ruckawriter) November 13, 2015He should take a good look at himself, because he later retweeted some more apologia for Islam, like this same nonsense Busiek did about IS wanting to create "Islamophobia". And again, without ever bothering to acknowledge the exact verses inside the Koran.
My heart goes out to the people of Paris and our friends at @UrbanComics who lost one of their own. Such pointless evil.— Andy Diggle (@andydiggle) November 14, 2015Unfortunately, Diggle's also retweeted apologia like this junk and this too:
#ISIS wants you to hate Muslims as a whole. It makes recruitment easier, and brings their goals closer. Be smarter than that.— Ron Marz (@ronmarz) November 14, 2015That said, I hope the maniacs of #ISIS are wiped from the face of the Earth.— Ron Marz (@ronmarz) November 14, 2015The best way to be smarter is to research the Koran/Hadith. Then he'll realize what Islamic State is motivated by. Otherwise, Marz's statement becomes meaningless.
I might buy GOP pols’ ravings about Muslim refugees were sincerely based on security if they hadn’t wallowed in immigrant bashing all year— Gerry Conway (@gerryconway) November 17, 2015The GOP’s ugly and reflexive anti-immigrant posture makes their current Security Theatrics about Muslim refugees suspect on every level— Gerry Conway (@gerryconway) November 17, 2015I wonder if that's what Conway thinks of any French politician/citizen now opposed to letting in the invaders?
Really interesting. "Why Syrian refugee passport found at Paris attack scene must be treated with caution" https://t.co/3zcU0XkDPh— Neil Gaiman (@neilhimself) November 15, 2015So he's using the UK Guardian as a channel for his ultra-leftist belief that ISIS is not exploiting the refugee crisis in Europe for their venomous goals? What a disgrace. Somebody else said:
@neilhimself first rule of being a liberal. Never let evidence get in the way of your ideology https://t.co/wz1GTiDki9— Caleb (@NCpreneur) November 15, 2015And that, alas, is just the problem with the otherwise pathetic, potentially overrated Gaiman.
ALL religions need to be aware that they sell people 'certainty' of what happens when we die, even tho they can not possibly have it. 1/2— Tim Seeley (@HackinTimSeeley) November 14, 2015Pretending to KNOW can give their most hateful & ignorant faithful too little fear of death & too little responsibility to the living. 2/2— Tim Seeley (@HackinTimSeeley) November 14, 2015Amazing article on ISIS in the Atlantic. Recommended read. And, Yes, it is about religion: https://t.co/8dUZXbljhJ— Tim Seeley (@HackinTimSeeley) November 14, 2015I get the feeling Seeley's drawing a moral equivalence between ALL religions, and won't make distinctions between good and bad. It brings to mind this report on how leftists blame all religion, and cannot tell the difference between one ideology or another. That's not the way to solve anything.
Here's also one more by a freelance editor named Will Dennis:
dear politicians, maybe cool it with all the “prayers” ….fucking prayers is what got us into this fucking mess in the first place.— Will Dennis (@ThrillioD) November 13, 2015So he too thinks there's no difference between good and bad religions? I'm afraid that's pretty sloppy too.
Labels: Europe and Asia, islam and jihad, moonbat artists, moonbat writers, terrorism, violence
Sadly, these tweets are what I expected from the crop of current knuckle-dragging creators. Ready-made apologies for terrorists. You can feel the white guilt dripping from those tweets. The person who tweeted at Gaiman about never letting evidence get in the way of ideology was the lone bright spot and voice of reason. I'm curious if Dan Jurgens tweeted about the Paris attacks, especially considering his non-liberal bent.
Posted by
Unknown |
1:52 PM
Ironically, the leftists repeatedly chant that we can't blame all Muslims for terrorism, that we have to make distinctions between the moderate Muslims and the extremists, that ISIS is not really Islamic, and that 99.9% of Muslims are peaceable and harmless.
Then they paint all religions with the same brush, and make no distinctions between Judaism and Christianity on the one hand, and Islam on the other.
The fact is that some religions were never violent, some were violent in the past but eventually outgrew violence, and some are still violent.
Liberals constantly criticize Christianity, and never criticize Islam. Just as animal rights activists yell at housewives who wear fur coats, but they never pick fights with biker gangs who wear leather jackets.
Posted by
Anonymous |
12:27 PM
Why is it always Paris to be targeted, why not Rome or London or some other city?
Posted by
Anonymous |
12:19 PM