« Home | What is Nick Spencer saying about unscreened immig... » | Tribune News Service sugarcoats Marvel reboot » | Mary Jane Watson among ComicBook's top 5 redheads » | Stan Lee biography in comics format » | Waid's comments on Carson » | 6 tweets by Busiek about Ben Carson » | Several tweets by Nick Spencer » | Hunger Games cast member says publishers won't giv... » | Political correctness affects manga mascots in Jap... » | Is Disney putting an end to "slave Leia" outfits f... » 

Tuesday, November 17, 2015 

More comments by creators about Paris bloodbath

Here's some more comments by creators about the jihad in Paris. We'll start first with those who, though leftist they may be, say something decent:


Okay, that's respectable enough. But, if they still hold fast to ultra-leftist standings on Islam and immigration, then these can't be taken at face value.

Now, for some of the usual disappointments. For example, if we determine a writer's persona by what he retweets, then here's a screenshot to check:
Busiek retweeted some of the most laughable apologia possible, which comes unglued when the birdbrain who wrote that junk blames right-wingers for everything. And Busiek then proceeds to make everything worse when he says:


Sarcasm or not, I am not amused by his petty swipes at Trump, no matter how weak I already find some of Trump's approach as it is. More hugely disappointing efforts to divert attention from pressing issues and worry about accepting in "refugees" whom I doubt they'd ever let into their own houses despite their stances.

He should take a good look at himself, because he later retweeted some more apologia for Islam, like this same nonsense Busiek did about IS wanting to create "Islamophobia". And again, without ever bothering to acknowledge the exact verses inside the Koran.

Unfortunately, Diggle's also retweeted apologia like this junk and this too:
I sure don't take this Diggle's statements at face value. What we really need is a story about infiltrators who intend evil and how to defeat them.


The best way to be smarter is to research the Koran/Hadith. Then he'll realize what Islamic State is motivated by. Otherwise, Marz's statement becomes meaningless.


I wonder if that's what Conway thinks of any French politician/citizen now opposed to letting in the invaders?

So he's using the UK Guardian as a channel for his ultra-leftist belief that ISIS is not exploiting the refugee crisis in Europe for their venomous goals? What a disgrace. Somebody else said:

And that, alas, is just the problem with the otherwise pathetic, potentially overrated Gaiman.



I get the feeling Seeley's drawing a moral equivalence between ALL religions, and won't make distinctions between good and bad. It brings to mind this report on how leftists blame all religion, and cannot tell the difference between one ideology or another. That's not the way to solve anything.

Here's also one more by a freelance editor named Will Dennis:

So he too thinks there's no difference between good and bad religions? I'm afraid that's pretty sloppy too.

Labels: , , , , ,

Sadly, these tweets are what I expected from the crop of current knuckle-dragging creators. Ready-made apologies for terrorists. You can feel the white guilt dripping from those tweets. The person who tweeted at Gaiman about never letting evidence get in the way of ideology was the lone bright spot and voice of reason. I'm curious if Dan Jurgens tweeted about the Paris attacks, especially considering his non-liberal bent.

Ironically, the leftists repeatedly chant that we can't blame all Muslims for terrorism, that we have to make distinctions between the moderate Muslims and the extremists, that ISIS is not really Islamic, and that 99.9% of Muslims are peaceable and harmless.

Then they paint all religions with the same brush, and make no distinctions between Judaism and Christianity on the one hand, and Islam on the other.

The fact is that some religions were never violent, some were violent in the past but eventually outgrew violence, and some are still violent.

Liberals constantly criticize Christianity, and never criticize Islam. Just as animal rights activists yell at housewives who wear fur coats, but they never pick fights with biker gangs who wear leather jackets.

Why is it always Paris to be targeted, why not Rome or London or some other city?

Post a Comment

Links to this post

Create a Link

About me

  • I'm Avi Green
  • From Jerusalem, Israel
  • I was born in Pennsylvania in 1974, and moved to Israel in 1983. I also enjoyed reading a lot of comics when I was young, the first being Fantastic Four. I maintain a strong belief in the public's right to knowledge and accuracy in facts. I like to think of myself as a conservative-style version of Clark Kent. I don't expect to be perfect at the job, but I do my best.
My profile

Archives

Links

  • avigreen2002@yahoo.com
  • Fansites I Created

  • Hawkfan
  • The Greatest Thing on Earth!
  • The Outer Observatory
  • Earth's Mightiest Heroines
  • The Co-Stars Primer
  • Comic book websites (open menu)

    Comic book weblogs (open menu)

    Writers and Artists (open menu)

    Miscellanous links (open menu)

  • GoStats charts
  • Click here to see website statistics
  • blog search directory blog directory Bloggeries Blog Directory Top Blogs Entertainment blogs Entertainment Blogs
    Entertainment blog TopOfBlogs Israel Blogs
    View My Stats Comics blog Blog Directory & Search engine blog directory
eXTReMe Tracker Locations of visitors to this page

    This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

    make money online blogger templates

Older Posts Newer Posts

The Four Color Media Monitor is powered by Blogspot and Gecko & Fly.
No part of the content or the blog may be reproduced without prior written permission.
Join the Google Adsense program and learn how to make money online.