Simone boomerangs back on the bathroom bill rants
Even long after some LGBT activists themselves backed away from advocating that transgenders be allowed to use public bathrooms for the opposite sex, and proof was available that there are women who find it objectionable, Gail Simone still keeps up the unverified narratives that hurt women far more than helping them. It began with the following:
I was thinking the same thing about far-left activists like Simone, who repeat word-for-word the narratives of agenda pushers on the left, acting like everything they say is right, everything conservatives say is wrong, and acting as though rightists are the root cause of all evil.
And that's why even her rhetoric didn't work. It's also why she may not find much of an audience, female or otherwise, in the future if any self-respecting women who know her positions feel she's not speaking for them, and only obsessing herself over irresponsible standings. Just look at the downfall Target department stores took; does that not say something? She knows it does, but is the kind of leftist who has the ability to shut out all reason.
Oh, I'll bet she doesn't. She doesn't have the courage to name/link any of them because somebody might come back and say, "I think they have a point". Here's where she gets into the subject directly:
And what's that supposed to mean? That transgenders are saints? If "cisgenders" aren't, then neither are transgenders. But that's probably beside the point. What matters is that these steps have been enacted at the expense of women and children's safety in public facilities, without any proper steps taken to ensure safety and security. And that deranged predatory men pretending to be women or transvestites have exploited these approvals so they can stalk innocents. Suppose Eddie Berganza pulled stunts like this? But then, Simone's already suggested that matters little to her.
And predators, no matter their physicality/orientation, going into the bathrooms of the opposite sex and harassing/assaulting women in any way isn't invasive? What a disgrace. She deserved to lose any major jobs she had with the Big Two.
I don't think she believes a word of her own. I think she actually knows this is very risky position she's taking, but she's so full of herself, she just won't listen to reason.
Look who lives in denial. What matters is that there are deranged men exploiting the approvals to commit felonies in bathrooms. By the logic she's going by, even Theresa Saldana's attacker would've been fictional.
So she admits there's pretenders out there taking advantage of these terrible policies? Alas, doubtful.
Umm, who says transgenders can't use the bathroom pertaining to their actual, biological sex? Male transgenders are allowed to use the men's room and female transgenders the ladies' room. Point of fact: even if a man is born with seemingly feminine features, he's still biologically male, and a woman born with seemingly masculine features is still biologically female. The menfolk will never get pregnant and the women will. The transgender men will usually have an advantage in physical strength and the transgender women not as much.
You won't be helping them if you preach sainthood, Gail. Besides, who said the laws are only aimed against transgenders? They're mainly meant to protect against any biological man who's a predator.
Anyone who acts like sexual harassment and abuse don't exist in any way, shape or form has no business addressing the subject in the first place. Again, the point she's really obscuring is that the platform she's advocating is being promoted at the expense of women and children's safety, all without proper discussion of safety policies.
Oh, an advocacy for Obamacare, specially disguised as some kind of "issue". And these weren't the only crap she spewed out. There's also:
"Ottoman"? What's that supposed to be, a subtle insult to the Armenian victims of Medz Yeghern during WW1?!?
I'll say. So she still associates with the political movement that turned its back on sex abuse scandals and even shunned Wonder Women for petty reasons she was lending her own support to some time back. Not a very inspiring idea, I don't think.
Simone hasn't learned any lessons. And if not, then she was never qualified for the assignments she got in the past.
Okay, I have a thought and people who are out there who know this topic better can correct me if I'm wrong, but I've noticed a thing.— GAIL SIMONE (@GailSimone) February 28, 2017
You know how it seems like the entire jard right wing on social media will very sharply and suddenly start repeating some new thought...— GAIL SIMONE (@GailSimone) February 28, 2017
...that will absolutely represent a pivot, not in intent, but in framing. Like, one of those shitty websites will say something, and soon...— GAIL SIMONE (@GailSimone) February 28, 2017
...thousands of people repeat it almost word-for-word, in a We-Have-Always-Been-At-War-With-Eurasia thing? Almost verbatim, overnight.— GAIL SIMONE (@GailSimone) February 28, 2017
I was thinking the same thing about far-left activists like Simone, who repeat word-for-word the narratives of agenda pushers on the left, acting like everything they say is right, everything conservatives say is wrong, and acting as though rightists are the root cause of all evil.
It usually signals that an appeal to ignorance is not catching fire as hoped, so they try some new, less incindiary rhetoric. Right?— GAIL SIMONE (@GailSimone) February 28, 2017
And that's why even her rhetoric didn't work. It's also why she may not find much of an audience, female or otherwise, in the future if any self-respecting women who know her positions feel she's not speaking for them, and only obsessing herself over irresponsible standings. Just look at the downfall Target department stores took; does that not say something? She knows it does, but is the kind of leftist who has the ability to shut out all reason.
I don't know what the root websites or who the key voices are in these overnight swerves, and I don't care, but it's inescapable.— GAIL SIMONE (@GailSimone) February 28, 2017
Oh, I'll bet she doesn't. She doesn't have the courage to name/link any of them because somebody might come back and say, "I think they have a point". Here's where she gets into the subject directly:
All right, for the past quite-a-while, the right has been demonizing and othering trans people. Hard. Relentlessly.— GAIL SIMONE (@GailSimone) February 28, 2017
And what's that supposed to mean? That transgenders are saints? If "cisgenders" aren't, then neither are transgenders. But that's probably beside the point. What matters is that these steps have been enacted at the expense of women and children's safety in public facilities, without any proper steps taken to ensure safety and security. And that deranged predatory men pretending to be women or transvestites have exploited these approvals so they can stalk innocents. Suppose Eddie Berganza pulled stunts like this? But then, Simone's already suggested that matters little to her.
But in the past very few days, I have suddenly seen all the usual suspects change their tactic very noticeably, with identical language.— GAIL SIMONE (@GailSimone) February 28, 2017
They want these fucking bathroom laws passed, they are completely invasive and horrendous, and it turns out, not everyone wants them passed.— GAIL SIMONE (@GailSimone) February 28, 2017
And predators, no matter their physicality/orientation, going into the bathrooms of the opposite sex and harassing/assaulting women in any way isn't invasive? What a disgrace. She deserved to lose any major jobs she had with the Big Two.
Maybe too many people know someone trans, or maybe people just don't believe their horseshit, who knows. But the chatter changed suddenly.— GAIL SIMONE (@GailSimone) February 28, 2017
I don't think she believes a word of her own. I think she actually knows this is very risky position she's taking, but she's so full of herself, she just won't listen to reason.
Now they are all saying, it's not the trans people who are the problem, it's 'people taking advantage of the laws.' See, NOT trans people...— GAIL SIMONE (@GailSimone) February 28, 2017
But this apparently unending and completely fictional mass of people who are PRETENDING to be trans to destroy America's urine repositories.— GAIL SIMONE (@GailSimone) February 28, 2017
Over and over again, people brought up that there IS no wave of trans people causing problems in bathrooms. And it seemed to stick.— GAIL SIMONE (@GailSimone) February 28, 2017
Look who lives in denial. What matters is that there are deranged men exploiting the approvals to commit felonies in bathrooms. By the logic she's going by, even Theresa Saldana's attacker would've been fictional.
So some genius said, HEY! What if we pretend that the left has us all wrong and we're super compassionate! It's all these FAKE trans people!— GAIL SIMONE (@GailSimone) February 28, 2017
So she admits there's pretenders out there taking advantage of these terrible policies? Alas, doubtful.
It's everywhere. I mean, it's in dozens of conversations suddenly, very conveniently and I'm sure COINCIDENTALLY.— GAIL SIMONE (@GailSimone) February 28, 2017
This way, they get to do both, they get to discriminate against people they ADMIT are doing no harm, AND they get to pretend they're not.— GAIL SIMONE (@GailSimone) February 28, 2017
If trans people are not a threat, as you've been implying for ages, how do you justify taking away their civil rights?— GAIL SIMONE (@GailSimone) February 28, 2017
Umm, who says transgenders can't use the bathroom pertaining to their actual, biological sex? Male transgenders are allowed to use the men's room and female transgenders the ladies' room. Point of fact: even if a man is born with seemingly feminine features, he's still biologically male, and a woman born with seemingly masculine features is still biologically female. The menfolk will never get pregnant and the women will. The transgender men will usually have an advantage in physical strength and the transgender women not as much.
If trans people are not the problem (and they clearly aren't), then why do you want laws that ONLY target them specifically?— GAIL SIMONE (@GailSimone) February 28, 2017
You won't be helping them if you preach sainthood, Gail. Besides, who said the laws are only aimed against transgenders? They're mainly meant to protect against any biological man who's a predator.
Please, don't be fooled. These same people were attacking trans people as predators just a few weeks ago. It was a lie then, too.— GAIL SIMONE (@GailSimone) February 28, 2017
They want to be bigots, but they don't want to be CALLED bigots. That's all.— GAIL SIMONE (@GailSimone) February 28, 2017
Screw that noise. These laws are meant to put people at risk for a problem that doesn't exist. Don't fall for it.#Transrights— GAIL SIMONE (@GailSimone) February 28, 2017
Anyone who acts like sexual harassment and abuse don't exist in any way, shape or form has no business addressing the subject in the first place. Again, the point she's really obscuring is that the platform she's advocating is being promoted at the expense of women and children's safety, all without proper discussion of safety policies.
Yeah, the party that desperately wants to take away women's health care and safety net suddenly are our protectors. Sure. https://t.co/4d95b5RKtu— GAIL SIMONE (@GailSimone) February 28, 2017
But controled, widely disseminated sophistry, eagerly viralized as if that was their thinking all along. https://t.co/Ul8UI4xqp5— GAIL SIMONE (@GailSimone) February 28, 2017
Oh, an advocacy for Obamacare, specially disguised as some kind of "issue". And these weren't the only crap she spewed out. There's also:
There was a massive Trump rally in the back seat of my car but there was still room for groceries and an ottoman.— GAIL SIMONE (@GailSimone) February 28, 2017
"Ottoman"? What's that supposed to be, a subtle insult to the Armenian victims of Medz Yeghern during WW1?!?
I am totally going to speak at the U.N., guys.— GAIL SIMONE (@GailSimone) March 1, 2017
Weird.
I'll say. So she still associates with the political movement that turned its back on sex abuse scandals and even shunned Wonder Women for petty reasons she was lending her own support to some time back. Not a very inspiring idea, I don't think.
Simone hasn't learned any lessons. And if not, then she was never qualified for the assignments she got in the past.
Labels: misogyny and racism, moonbat writers, politics, violence
Why aren't you more worried and skittish about a deranged transgender taking advantage of you, or men in general?
Posted by
Anonymous |
7:44 PM