Slott quarrels with another guy over Trump and the shooting in Virginia
Here's some of Dan Slott's latest leftist tirades, one that led into another. First, he posted the following propaganda from Forbes:
Oh did he? According to this wire service article from the Wash. Post, Trump donated a lot of dough to a children's charity:
In fact, the guy Slott was arguing with has an interesting point about love for Disneyland: why does Slott love the place if the founder was a conservative/Republican? In fact, for several years now, the Disney Corp's owned Marvel, where he works. Why does he love a company founded by a guy with standings he hates, let alone want Marvel to be owned by such a place, no matter their politics today? The quarrel continued:
Sure seems like he spends more time tweeting online than he does at charity events. Did he ever donate to victims of Islamic terrorism?
Someone with objectivity wouldn't spend time attacking all conservatives as inherently evil while legitimizing Islamofascism at all costs. The discussion moves to the terrible incident where Rep. Steve Scalise was shot and critically injured by a crazed leftist gunman in Alexandria at a baseball practice:
Oh, trying to change the subject, is he? And what proof does he have that Jones did something like that?
Trying to exonerate Sanger with an article from such a cruddy site isn't going to do any good. She had a shoddy personality, and while she may not have marketed abortions per se within the time she was still alive (PP actually began that after her passing), she still did a lot of harm to society in her time.
And Islam's "prophet" Muhammed wasn't misogynist, huh? Being called an Islamophobe happens to be an honor, so Slott would do well not to be self-congratulatory. Oh, and writing up a story where Doc Ock exploits Mary Jane Watson while disguised in Peter Parker's body isn't misogynist either? Slott's hypocrisy is jaw-dropping. IMO, when leftists call somebody whose politics they don't agree with "sexist/racist", it's just a "fancier" way of cursing at them.
So then Slott pressed the mute option, and demonstrated how tolerant and respectable he really is of conservatives. He added one more item:
In other words, he's trying to obscure shootings stemming from ideological divide. How very convenient of him. Again, he's accomplished the feat of being narrow and close minded, showing no genuine concern for the cesspool the left wing's become. Besides MAGA, how about if we were to make Marvel/DC great again, by distancing awful writers like Slott from their products he doesn't deserve to be writing?
Why do you love a guy who funneled $1.2M away from a charity for children with cancer.— Dan Slott (@DanSlott) June 14, 2017
Makes no sense to me.https://t.co/6VX75gQ25B
Oh did he? According to this wire service article from the Wash. Post, Trump donated a lot of dough to a children's charity:
"You won't hear this in the media, but Donald gave $20 million to the St. Jude children's home. Twenty million dollars," said Phil Ruffin, the owner of the Treasure Island casino, which was the site of the rally.And that's Slott, the moonbat who sees only what he wants to. Newsmax has further confirmation of Trump's contribution. He even donated to Citizens United, and Ivanka Trump's also made some donations. What Forbes is claiming now is obviously one of the many expected attempts to smear the new POTUS.
The crowd cheered. Trump mouthed "Thank you" twice and waved.
"He could have used that $20 million for television ads, but he decided to give with children with cancer," Ruffin said. "That's Donald Trump."
In fact, the guy Slott was arguing with has an interesting point about love for Disneyland: why does Slott love the place if the founder was a conservative/Republican? In fact, for several years now, the Disney Corp's owned Marvel, where he works. Why does he love a company founded by a guy with standings he hates, let alone want Marvel to be owned by such a place, no matter their politics today? The quarrel continued:
I spend time raising charity at events. Nice deflection.— Dan Slott (@DanSlott) June 14, 2017
Trump is objectively evil and worse than ANY candidate in the last election.
Sure seems like he spends more time tweeting online than he does at charity events. Did he ever donate to victims of Islamic terrorism?
Someone who loved America wouldn't support someone this objectively bad AND evil. Sorry.— Dan Slott (@DanSlott) June 14, 2017
Someone with objectivity wouldn't spend time attacking all conservatives as inherently evil while legitimizing Islamofascism at all costs. The discussion moves to the terrible incident where Rep. Steve Scalise was shot and critically injured by a crazed leftist gunman in Alexandria at a baseball practice:
Liberals like you are the worst thing about this country. How happy were you that a republican congressman was shot today?— KingAl99 (@MasterAl99) June 14, 2017
.@MasterAl99 I'm not happy when ANY American is shot.— Dan Slott (@DanSlott) June 14, 2017
You've RT'ed Sandy Hook denier Alex Jones in your feed.
You get that's bad, right? https://t.co/sLUQoC9Ofu
Oh, trying to change the subject, is he? And what proof does he have that Jones did something like that?
No. You're an ill-informed conspiracy theorist who gets their "facts" from Bretibart and the Religious Right. https://t.co/tN29fGh9UC— Dan Slott (@DanSlott) June 14, 2017
Trying to exonerate Sanger with an article from such a cruddy site isn't going to do any good. She had a shoddy personality, and while she may not have marketed abortions per se within the time she was still alive (PP actually began that after her passing), she still did a lot of harm to society in her time.
I'll admit TWO things: Going by your comments to me today, you're a misogynist.— Dan Slott (@DanSlott) June 14, 2017
Going by your feed you're also an Islamophobe. Bye.👋
And Islam's "prophet" Muhammed wasn't misogynist, huh? Being called an Islamophobe happens to be an honor, so Slott would do well not to be self-congratulatory. Oh, and writing up a story where Doc Ock exploits Mary Jane Watson while disguised in Peter Parker's body isn't misogynist either? Slott's hypocrisy is jaw-dropping. IMO, when leftists call somebody whose politics they don't agree with "sexist/racist", it's just a "fancier" way of cursing at them.
No hate here. Good luck everyone. Let's MAGA! Hope you are all cured from the pre-existing condition of liberalism. Thoughts and prayers.— KingAl99 (@MasterAl99) June 14, 2017
So then Slott pressed the mute option, and demonstrated how tolerant and respectable he really is of conservatives. He added one more item:
There are so many shootings in America that we have to talk about them afterwards. There is no "good time" to wait and have the discussion.— Dan Slott (@DanSlott) June 14, 2017
In other words, he's trying to obscure shootings stemming from ideological divide. How very convenient of him. Again, he's accomplished the feat of being narrow and close minded, showing no genuine concern for the cesspool the left wing's become. Besides MAGA, how about if we were to make Marvel/DC great again, by distancing awful writers like Slott from their products he doesn't deserve to be writing?
Labels: islam and jihad, marvel comics, misogyny and racism, moonbat writers, politics, Spider-Man, terrorism, violence, women of marvel
A week before the shooting in Virginia, Jason Fuller, in an article or column in the Huffington Post, called for the execution of Trump and anyone assisting in his agenda.
Republicans in Congress-Tom Garrett, Claudia Tenney, Martha McSally-have received death threats.
"Antifa" thugs are rioting in the streets and asaulting victims.
And Slott's response is to hurl the usual epithets (racist, misogynist, Islamophobe) at anyone who disagrees with him about anything.
Posted by
Anonymous |
10:18 AM