New cartoon film based on Orwell's Animal Farm succumbs to anti-conservative propaganda

Mark Tapson at Front Page reviewed a new cartoon movie adapted from George Orwell's Animal Farm, and what a shock, it's sadly an anti-Trump metaphor:

You will recall that the fable centers on animals who revolt against their farmer master, take over the farm, set out to fashion a collectivist utopia in which “All animals are equal,” and ultimately succumb to the same fate to which all collectivist endeavors lead: all wealth concentrated in the hands of a few while the rest starve and chafe under an abuse of authoritarian power.

But while the novella may have universal themes about power, totalitarianism, and hypocrisy, Orwell’s specific target was the Stalinist regime in Russia. A socialist himself, Orwell nevertheless recognized and spoke out against the horrors of totalitarianism.

This animated version was directed by actor Andy Serkis – best-known for his role as Gollum in The Lord of the Rings trilogy – who dreamed of giving the tale an updated spin for a new generation. He insists that his take is politically fair and balanced: “We aimed to tell this story examining contemporary themes and references without being in any way partisan,” he told journalists. “Absolute power corrupts absolutely, no matter who is in charge.”

This is pure misdirection. Did anyone think a mainstream Hollywood film, which this is, would miss an opportunity to snipe at Trump and capitalism? Andy Serkis gave away the game when he showed up on the red carpet at the film’s premiere sporting a red MAGA cap whose slogan was changed to read, “Make Animal Farm Fiction Again” – clearly signaling that he believes we are currently living under an authoritarian regime led by capitalist icon Donald Trump.

And he introduces a character not in the original story: the ruthlessly greedy billionaire Freida Pilkington (voiced by Glenn “Fatal Attraction” Close) who roars around in a vehicle clearly resembling a Cybertruck – in other words, she is a stand-in for the mega-capitalist the Left loves to hate, Elon Musk.

Pilkington wants the animals’ farm, so she manipulates the pig leader Napoleon (who represented Stalin in the novella), whose own greed makes him an easy mark. But in Orwell’s version, the ruthless lust for power is the key danger. Greed is not the issue – it is a consequence of unchecked power, yes, but not a central theme, although under collectivist regimes, those in power always live like kings. Serkis, USA Today notes, instead “gravitated toward themes of capitalism, wealth and overconsumption.”

Then there is the hopeful ending in which the animals still believe in the power of collective action for a better future, which runs against the grain of Orwell’s chilling final line about the animals having essentially become indistinguishable from corrupt humans. USA Today sees the movie’s ending as giving viewers “closure,” but in fact it dulls the impact of Orwell’s warning and leaves us feeling not even entertained, much less inspired. It doesn’t help that the incongruous pratfalls and fart jokes simply don’t work.

Well this is bad alright. But also appalling and stupefying is who distributed it:

The baffling thing is that the film is distributed by the pro-Christian, pro-capitalist Angel Studios. If this adaptation were faithful to Orwell’s original vision, Angel’s connection would be understandable. But why would Angel want a clunky, anti-capitalist dud in its repertoire? One social media user put forward this plausible theory: “What Angel gets out of distributing this terrible movie with an all-star cast is that it will break a taboo among mainstream Hollywood figures against working on Angel-produced projects.” If so, this would be a betrayal of Angel’s loyal, Hollywood-despising core audience, and a decision that will likely backfire.

Put another way, they sold out, all because it's such a big deal to be accepted by the Hollywood leftist mainstream. I read the original novella years ago, and IMO, it's all that's needed. Orwell's book didn't need to be adapted to screen, let alone animation, and certainly not with such pretentious people overseeing the production.

The film's amazingly gotten a poor reception, as John Nolte at Breitbart notes, even from leftists, and it's thudded at the box office. Making matters worse is what one of the actors in the film wants in real life, which doesn't help the film's PR any more than Pedro Pascal did the latest Fantastic Four movie when he engaged in political rhetoric. Unfortunately, if recent conduct in Hollywood is any suggestion, neither director Serkis nor the studios involved will learn serious lessons from the catastrophe their political obsessions resulted in, and we could be seeing more of the same in the coming years.