« Home | Dan Slott exploits tragedy in San Bernardino for m... » | How feminists screw up the whole argument about th... » | Top Cow's Matt Hawkins thinks "Islamophobia" is a ... » | In 3rd Captain America movie, the world loathes th... » | Is Frank Miller reverting to leftism? » | Gail Simone puts down older designs as "dated" » | Cinema Blend sees nothing wrong with "diversifying... » | Slott's still got pretty thin skin » | Liberal politics and darkness seep into Jessica Jo... » | Again, it looks like 3rd Captain America movie is ... » 

Sunday, December 06, 2015 

Marz's reactions to tragedy in San Bernardino

And now for Ron Marz's responses to the week's tragedy, which are about what you could expect - he has used a violent crime alternately as an excuse for gun control advocacy, and to attack conservatives. For example, he said:

Nope, this is the situation any poor education system has decreed we live in, because they have no interest in teaching students why violence is wrong. This is also the situation that results from "cultural sensitivity" that hinders the ability to combat violent ideologies effectively.

Marz should be ashamed of himself for lack of interest in condemning any ideology that promotes murderous rampages. He also doesn't seem particularly concerned about the neighbor of the jihadists who purportedly bought the weapons used in the assault.

It was just an insult to laws that were meant to defend people's safety. Quit trying to fool anybody.

He couldn't bring himself to admit we have a jihad problem. The same kind of tragedy that's poisoned Europe, and which jelly spined politicians won't do anything to stop.

Again, there goes an ignoramus spouting off ditherings meant for himself. He must've written that as a vindictive reaction to his own hopes that it would be a right-winger, after every leftarded narrative was refuted. Just who are these people he speaks of? From what I can tell, he means conservatives in the USA, and not Islamofascists overseas. It's also extremely offensive how he implies everyone's "smugly pleased". *Ahem* NOBODY with half a brain is even remotely pleased whenever there's a bloodbath anywhere, and it makes no difference what the ideological background of the criminals is. What matters is that whoever the perpetrators of a violent crime were, they did something repulsive that goes throughly against human values.

How about some conservative websites? Maybe some milbloggers?

For Marz, it's lamenting all the way-too-easy scapegoats, because he's little more than a coward himself.

Marz has only demonstrated with all this how hermetically sealed off he is to what repellent ideologies are like.

He goes on to respond to a Rolling Stone story about a TV channel advertising guns, saying:

The answer is more self-defense, including in Europe. Oh, and interesting how he, like Dan Slott, is using Rolling Stone as a source of recommended news, after the offensive cover story they ran dedicated to one of the Boston marathon bombers. He just demonstrates yet again why he'd be better off refraining from these kind political issues.

Labels: , , , , ,

Garland, Texas: Jihadists attack an art contest. Armed cops stop them cold. The only casualties are the attackers. The media still ridicule the idea that armed good guys can stop armed bad guys. They also blame the intended victims for provoking the terrorists.

Paris: ISIS terrorists murder unarmed victims. Rep. Jan Schakowski (D-IL) says it shows the need for "sensible gun laws" in the USA. (Did ISIS buy their weapons in Texas or Florida?) One day earlier, Obama said that ISIS was "contained." (But he wants to admit thousands of Syrian "refugees" into the US. If ISIS is "contained," why are there refugees fleeing from it? And once Russia obliterates ISIS, what is Obama going to use as an excuse for importing "refugees"?)

BTW, Obama always says "ISIL," not ISIS. He considers Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, and "Palestine" to be the Levant, i.e., Israel has no right to exist.

Hillary says that terrorism has "nothing whatsoever" to do with Islam. John Kerry says that terrorism has "nothing to do with Islam, and everything to do with abuse, psychopathism, criminality...you name it." (As long as you don't name it Islam or Muslim extremism.) Bernie Sanders blames terrorism on climate change.

Mali: terrorists murder unarmed victims. They spare the hostages who can quote the Koran, and execute those who can't.

Colorado: a lone weirdo, with no known affiliations to any organizations, shoots victims at a Planned Parenthood clinic. Before any facts are known, the media start speculating about the Tea Party, Christians, Republicans, talk radio, etc., etc.

San Bernardino: Jihadists murder unarmed victims, in a designated gun-free zone, in a state with strict gun laws. One of them recently visited the Middle East. Another was from the Middle East, and came to the US, sailing through the screening process and obtaining a visa. The media claim that the motives are "unclear," and warn against rushing to judgment. Marz, Slott, and the rest of the Left blame the NRA.

Attorney General Loretta Lynch calls the San Bernardino massacre a "wonderful opportunity" to push for more anti-gun legislation. Three weeks after the Paris massacre, Obama says that mass shootings never happen in civilized countries other than the US.

Senator Barbara Boxer says that California's "sensible" gun laws work, and that the state's crime rate has been declining for years. (The US crime rate has been declining nation-wide for years, and it has declined more in states with open carry and "shall issue" CCW policies.) Meanwhile, Obama cites the San Bernardino tragedy as proof that existing gun laws are inadequate, and that we need more anti-gun laws. Which is it?

Syed Farook's neighbor noticed his suspicious behavior, but was afraid to call the authorities, for fear of being called racist or Islamophobic. Considering that AG Lynch said (after the SB tragedy) that her #1 priority was protecting Muslims from a backlash, the neighbor's fear was understandable. He probably would have been railroaded to federal prison for a hate crime.

Maybe better vetting for immigrants would have kept Tashfoon Malik out of the US. But Obama wants to import more and more Muslim migrants, and anyone who suggests more careful screening for immigrants is accused of racism, Islamophobia, xenophobia, yadda yadda yadda.

And maybe better surveillance of suspicious activity would have caught Farooq sooner. But Obama has, in effect, ordered the FBI and Homeland Security not to spy on Muslims since 2011. Meanwhile, the IRS targets Jewish charities.

Obama and his minions (including Marz and Slott) are desperately chanting the "NRA, NRA, NRA" mantra to divert attention from the administration's failed policies, and from the dhimmitude and political correctness that contributed to the terrorist attacks.

Jihadists murder unarmed victims in a designated gun-free zone, in a state with strict gun control laws. One of the killers had visited the Middle East. Another was from the Middle East, and was able to get through the existing immigration process. The Obama administration's own officials admit that they cannot adequately vet all immigrants. Also, the killers were not on the No-Fly List, or any other terrorist watch list.

A neighbor had noticed their suspicious behavior, but was afraid to report it to the police, for fear of being labeled a racist or an Islamophobe.

The administration's response:

1. Demand more anti-gun laws. Including a bill to prevent the sale of guns to anyone on the No-Fly List. Which would NOT include Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik.

2. Admit more and more Muslim immigrants from the Middle East. (And hurl accusations of racism at anyone who suggests temporarily suspending immigration until we work out better vetting procedures.)

3. The attorney general promises to "take action" if anyone says anything that might "raise the mantle" of anti-Muslim sentiment.

Welcome to Bizarro World.

Post a Comment

About me

  • I'm Avi Green
  • From Jerusalem, Israel
  • I was born in Pennsylvania in 1974, and moved to Israel in 1983. I also enjoyed reading a lot of comics when I was young, the first being Fantastic Four. I maintain a strong belief in the public's right to knowledge and accuracy in facts. I like to think of myself as a conservative-style version of Clark Kent. I don't expect to be perfect at the job, but I do my best.
My profile



  • avigreen2002@yahoo.com
  • Fansites I Created

  • Hawkfan
  • The Greatest Thing on Earth!
  • The Outer Observatory
  • Earth's Mightiest Heroines
  • The Co-Stars Primer
  • Realtime Website Traffic

    Comic book websites (open menu)

    Comic book weblogs (open menu)

    Writers and Artists (open menu)

    Video commentators (open menu)

    Miscellanous links (open menu)

  • W3 Counter stats
  • Bio Link page
  • blog directory Bloggeries Blog Directory View My Stats Blog Directory & Search engine eXTReMe Tracker Locations of visitors to this page  
    Flag Counter

    This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

    make money online blogger templates

Older Posts Newer Posts

The Four Color Media Monitor is powered by Blogspot and Gecko & Fly.
No part of the content or the blog may be reproduced without prior written permission.
Join the Google Adsense program and learn how to make money online.