Would actor Daniel Radcliffe really make a suitable star for a Wolverine movie?

ComicBook interviewed UK actor Daniel Radcliffe, known today for playing Harry Potter in 8 movies, and he mentioned a rumor that sprouted on the web about whether he'd play Wolverine:

Audiences were clamoring for you to pick up the mantle of Wolverine. Even for a split second, was that ever a consideration?

It was not. It was never real. It was a very flattering internet rumor. I was very happy about it, but it was never suggested in any kind of way by anybody with any power to make that happen. And, honestly, you would be stupid not to consider something like that, but if they do other Wolverines, being the person who follows Hugh Jackman is not on my bucket list for anything. For any role of his, particularly the role he has made the most iconic of his career, I am happy not to be doing that and let him keep doing it.

Are you a superhero guy? Would you consider joining the MCU or DCU?

I am so out of the loop. I feel like I don’t know what cycle we are on of the Marvel movies, and I have some catching up to do if I ever end up on one of them. But, yes, I am certainly not averse to it. I would never rule anything like that out. But, also, I am not necessarily clamoring to be in it or seeking that. I am lucky that I can judge any job by the quality of the script. So, if a script came in that was exciting, different, weird, and cool, then I’d be up for it no matter what it was.

He's out of the loop in more ways than one. Let's consider Radcliffe threw Potter author J.K Rowling under the bus after she objected to men identifying as transsexual entering women's bathrooms, and, like countless left-wing newspapers, obscured that she was a sexual assault victim herself, refusing to recognize that she has moral authority to speak on these issues. Based on that, I don't think Radcliffe would've made such a great actor for playing Logan, because he's hardly deserving of the role after betraying the novelist who created the books that led to his now famous role in film. In fact, look who's talking about judging by the merit of a script - the same man who won't judge by the merit of Rowling's statements, let alone serious real life science.

As a result, it's decidedly good if Radcliffe's not being considered for a role in Marvel movies, let alone DC movies. Besides, chances are he wouldn't care how woke they became, based partly on what politics he goes by, and as a result, what good does it do to say he can judge by script merit?