« Home | Grant Morrison's subtle anti-war statement for Din... » | The problems with vicious cultists in fandom » | Bill Finger does deserve credit as Batman's co-cre... » | Tragedy at Dark Knight Rises screening in Colorado... » | John Boot says the Dark Knight Rises lives up well... » | Ben Shapiro makes mistake of calling Robin crummy » | Richard C. Meyer's graphic novel is a good project... » | Leftists try to exploit a conservative writer's cr... » | Why does Steve Englehart think nobody does anythin... » | A new comic about the military » 

Monday, July 23, 2012 

Does Mark Waid know what he's saying anymore?

The AV Club interviewed Mark Waid about his past career, but not only is this a writer who's fallen into badness with stories like Irredeemable, it shows in a few of his replies here too that he can't even give a clear picture of what he set out to do with books like that. On Irredeemable, he said:
AVC: You’ve done superheroes as political allegory in Empire and Fantastic Four. Right now you’re doing them as a celebrity allegory in Insufferable. In general, what does the concept of a superhero mean to you?

MW: What it means to me is something I’m sort of protective of on an emotional level. A superhero is someone who, at some point or in some way, inspires hope or is the enemy of cynicism. Even if you bog it down with political allegory, or even if you’re doing celebrity allegory, or in the case of Irredeemable, it was very much an allegory of how the Internet and social media and celebrity conspires against the famous, and how that shapes us in this day and age. You still need to take the cynical out of it. I think there’s plenty of room in comics for cynical stories and cynical storytelling, and that’s a perfectly valid way of approaching your work, but I don’t think it belongs in the superhero comic, because I don’t think superheroes are cynical. I think superheroes are about flying. They’re not about moping.
Then why did he ever go out of his way to produce a mind-boggling book like Irredeemable in the first place, with its shoddy depiction of a would-be superhero who even turns to slaughter? That's not cynical and worse? Yet he says this is about the age of the Web, and doesn't reference the really chilling parts of Irredeemable and the hero Plutonian. Even if this was his own stand-alone story, the problem is that it's still contributing needlessly to the growing list of cynical stories being told about superheroes, or even adventure tales one would think are about heroism. Speaking of which, Adam Strange, one DC protagonist who's not a superhero per se, was a victim of this trend, which may have originated in the pages of Swamp Thing in 1986, but really came to a head with Richard Bruning's 1990 prestige format miniseries that set up the premise that Sardath used the Zeta Rays to teleport Adam to the planet Rann so he could serve as a breeding stud with Alanna, who was needlessly killed in the miniseries, while her father was turned into a crackpot. It was Waid himself who undid the dingier elements of this story a decade later in the pages of JLA, amazingly enough. Yet later with Irredeemable, he fell victim to what he says he doesn't think belongs in superhero comics.

On universes, he says:
AVC: You’ve worked with or spearheaded a couple of start-up comic-book companies. What did each of those different experiences teach you, with CrossGen and then BOOM! and now going to Thrillbent?

MW: The biggest takeaway from CrossGen was… [Laughs.] Don’t create a universe. That’s the biggest mistake you can make, man. Don’t bite off more than you can chew, and don’t create a damn universe. Just concentrate on doing good comics that make sense, and the stories are good, and don’t worry about servicing some overall, artificially created shared reality between 22 different series. You’re asking too much of your readers at that point, and also, it’s a lot for anybody to bite off and chew at this point. The Marvel universe works because the Marvel universe grew organically, and it grew out of the creative vision of Stan [Lee] and Jack [Kirby] and Steve Ditko and Larry Lieber and a small, small, small handful of guys. All right? Whereas other universes tend to be very ad hoc. That’s why the DC universe is never going to be as strong a shared universe as the Marvel universe, because the DC universe—and it’s not to pick, it’s just a statement of fact—the DC universe was created out of properties that coexisted for 50 years before they met. Frankly, there’s not a whole lot of difference between putting Green Arrow and Captain Marvel in the same story as there is putting Calvin and Hobbes and Mary Worth in the same story because they’re both comic strips. Whereas the Marvel universe, they created organically. At CrossGen, they tried to jumpstart it organically, but still, it was with an idea toward creating some sort of mega-universe you had to invest tons of time and money into as a reader to get all the nuances out of it. And even then, it only lasted a couple years. That universe never paid out. And where are they now? That was the big takeaway from CrossGen.
The only real mistake with Crossgen was made in the end, when they attempted a crossover not unlike the big two's overabundant crossovers (not to mention chairman Mark Alessi's inability to file for Chapter 11 early on if he was really short on wages for their contributors). His assertion that the DC universe's cast co-existed for decades "before meeting" is also inaccurate since the Justice Society was one of the first places where the original heroes met way back in the Golden Age, and even if they weren't all by the same creators, they did meet up in the same book and gradually came to work together.

And while the Marvel universe did grow organically years before, is Waid aware that it's also tragically deteriorated since Joe Quesada and Brian Bendis took over, tossing much of the universe and continuity into a pointless jumble, with Spider-Man and Wolverine appearing in more books than need be, the universe drowned in far too many crossovers and the Spider-marriage erased? And the latter is something he sadly approved of in contrast to when he tied the knot between Wally West and Linda Park in 2000. And if Waid's going to go willingly along with Quesada's destruction of Peter and Mark Jane Parker's marriage, then he's only made himself part of the problem.

Waid's main problem is that he hollows out the good points he could've made simply by playing along with editorial edicts by the big two's staffs, and by not being very honest about what Irredeemable was about.

Labels: , , , ,

I lost respect for Waid when he was one of the Spider-writers and along with the others (including Dan "Set the Record Straight" Slott) he was quite rude toward fans who objected to "One More Day" and also when he called the Tea Party "lunatics" on Twitter in response to the Captain America vs Tea Party controversy bakc in 2010.

Mark & I were friends back in the early 80's. I worked at Larry Herndon's Remember When and he helped me work the comics there. he also was one of only 4 people who new that Larry had died one day.
One thing he had was a very bad temper. he never took criticism well. We had many arguments in those days, that passed over and our friendship held. When he left to make the "Big Time", (He was named editor of the comic fanzine "Comics Reporter") He left many of his friends behind, and never even thanked us for the time we helped him begin his career.
I think since then he has decided he is the only one who truly understands what Comic Book fans want.

Plus I think his success has not only gone to his head. It has sent his ego on a trip that will never come back to earth until people finally turn their back on his agenda driven works.

Mark I loved our time together, but I'm glad it is in the past!

Post a Comment

Links to this post

Create a Link

About me

  • I'm Avi Green
  • From Jerusalem, Israel
  • I was born in Pennsylvania in 1974, and moved to Israel in 1983. I also enjoyed reading a lot of comics when I was young, the first being Fantastic Four. I maintain a strong belief in the public's right to knowledge and accuracy in facts. I like to think of myself as a conservative-style version of Clark Kent. I don't expect to be perfect at the job, but I do my best.
My profile

Archives

Links

  • avigreen2002@yahoo.com
  • Fansites I Created

  • Hawkfan
  • The Greatest Thing on Earth!
  • The Outer Observatory
  • Earth's Mightiest Heroines
  • The Co-Stars Primer
  • Comic book websites (open menu)

    Comic book weblogs (open menu)

    Writers and Artists (open menu)

    Miscellanous links (open menu)

  • GoStats charts
  • W3 Counter stats
  • Click here to see website statistics
  • blog directory Bloggeries Blog Directory Top Blogs Entertainment blogs Entertainment Blogs
    Entertainment blog TopOfBlogs
    View My Stats

    AmazingCounters.com

    Comics blog Blog Directory & Search engine blog directory eXTReMe Tracker Locations of visitors to this page

    This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

    make money online blogger templates

Older Posts Newer Posts

The Four Color Media Monitor is powered by Blogspot and Gecko & Fly.
No part of the content or the blog may be reproduced without prior written permission.
Join the Google Adsense program and learn how to make money online.