A new history book about the 90s cites Malibu comics, and unfortunately, also a certain ghoul
What's puzzling though, is that, as seen in the excerpt on the side, while the book does cite Jones as a leading contributor to the Malibu Ultraverse, it doesn't seem to actually credit him as the co-creator of Prime, their Billy Batson clone that took some of its elements to serious extremes, though it does state he was the writer for Freex. Is it because, by the time this book was ready to go to press, they were aware of Jones' child porn felonies for which he's now serving time, and the subject material made them uneasy in light of the discoveries, or, is it because Jones wasn't as responsible for the co-creation as Bob Jacobs and Len Strazewski were? An interesting question with no easy answers.
What the book's content also doesn't make clear is that the Malibu properties, still under Marvel's ownership last time I looked, have become some of the most ill-fated as a result of Jones' offenses, and won't be reprinted for a long, long time, as a result, not just because nobody will want to buy them, but also because we wouldn't want Jones to get any residuals. Nor will the back issues be worth much on the market now, and considering how icky Prime's content is, that's why it won't hold up well in view of the crimes Jones committed. Why, chances are Marvel won't even be able to sell off the properties he created or co-created, because Jones has rendered them toxic, and whatever movie deals they were hoping to make out of those books (which obviously never happened 20 years prior) are now buried deep. I can envision a Marvel sales manager telling business trade journals 10 years from now, "We tried to sell off the Malibu properties, to no avail. Nobody wanted to buy them, because Gerard Jones was credited to a significant number of issues and stories." Clearly, DC's not the only ones who wound up with egg on their face.
I think that's exactly why, if they're not clear about the disaster Jones caused and why it's made the properties toxic, what's the point of these history books if they won't take a moment to reflect on what's gone wrong in more ways than one?
Labels: dc comics, indie publishers, marvel comics, misogyny and racism, moonbat writers, violence
Well unless the nature of the crime is similar to the nature of what the writer/artist is currently working on or has worked on in the past, nothing should be preventing previously printed material from being reprinted and sold again. Especially if nobody knows about this guy since few people watch or read the news these days.
Posted by Anonymous | 10:08 AM
At least Jones is only a consumer of illegal goods instead of actually making them, which is infinitely worse (unless their is evidence otherwise). Still, this should be a good excuse to check out everyone who ever worked in the comic book industry and see what other criminal secrets lie beneath that fragile facade.
Posted by Anonymous | 11:08 AM
The Malibu properties have been in limbo at Marvel since at least 1996, long before the revelations about Jones came out. The problems with reviving the characters have to do with the contracts signed in 1993 with royalties granted creators when the Ultraverse was formed. The contracts aren’t impossible to work with, but Marvel is unwilling to work around them. Their lack of republication has nothing to do with Jones. This has all be confirmed several times in several places.
This is almost certainly a business decision driven by Marvel’s experiences with Miracleman and Angela. Neither property sold to the levels Marvel needed to sustain them, and there’s no reason to think the Ultraverse will have better sales. Only a small cult of ‘90s fans remember these books and they are now a distant memory, last seen 23 years ago.
It’s not the business of a history book chronicling the 1990s to discuss events that happened in the 2010s. There is no discussion of subsequent creator deaths, for instance, nor of their careers after that era. The book is objective and can be enjoyed by people of any political angle.
Posted by Anonymous | 9:20 AM
How much of that book was done before that particular piece of news broke out anyway, or any other significant information about any of the content in said book for that matter?
Posted by Anonymous | 3:09 PM