Dan Slott continues his sad hypocrisy
Dan Slott may have been told to cut out his repellent online cybertrolling by C.B. Cebulski over a year ago, but he still does make politically charged comments on Twitter at times, such as this one:
Somebody on the thread asked if he blocked followers of Ilhan Omar. A valid question, if you consider all the antisemitism she's espoused. Also worth considering the Islamic religion's homophobia/transphobia, and racism. If Slott cannot condemn Islam's embrace of all the other ideologies, then he's not against antisemitism, racism and homophobia at all. He's just virtue-signaling, as usual.
And it's a terrible shame Marvel continues to give Slott employment he never deserved.
I've run blockchains on the worst of a bad group. Those who unequivocally posted things that were racist, anti-Semitic, Islamophobic, transphobic & homophobic.— Dan Slott (@DanSlott) September 22, 2019
When I see someone complain they got "swept up" by one of those blocks, I think "Were you NOT reading that guy's posts?"
Somebody on the thread asked if he blocked followers of Ilhan Omar. A valid question, if you consider all the antisemitism she's espoused. Also worth considering the Islamic religion's homophobia/transphobia, and racism. If Slott cannot condemn Islam's embrace of all the other ideologies, then he's not against antisemitism, racism and homophobia at all. He's just virtue-signaling, as usual.
And it's a terrible shame Marvel continues to give Slott employment he never deserved.
Labels: islam and jihad, misogyny and racism, moonbat writers, politics
So what group did he supposedly blockchain? I doubt he actually had the energy or motivation to do this action.
Posted by
Anonymous |
12:28 PM
"If Slott cannot condemn Islam's embrace of all the other ideologies, then he's not against antisemitism, racism and homophobia at all. He's just virtue-signaling, as usual"
This makes it sound like you have become a convert to intersectionality; to the idea that you can’t look at racism, or homophobia, or anti-semitism in isolation, but have to see them as interacting, intersecting parts of a more complex system of oppression.
Not sure it is accurate though. Are you saying you can’t be against anti-semitism unless you are also against discrimination towards LGTBQ2S people?
Bear in mind that Slott said he only banned the worst of the worst; he didn’t say he banned all people who manifested prejudice.
And I am curious about why you describe this as a political statement. Being against blind hatred shouldn't be considered politically charged. It's a motherhood statement.
Posted by
Anonymous |
7:02 PM