Now DC's implying they'll turn Batman bisexual
With characters like Harley Quinn and Robin coming out as bisexual, DC Comics has been attempting to provide more representation for the LGBT community in their comics lately. And now, fans suspect that Bruce Wayne may be the latest character to come out in the new Batman comic.Well I knew Zdarsky was already proving himself a most extremely pretentious [left-wing] scriptwriter, and this is clearly an example of his desire to virtue-signal, along with leaving his SJW mark on one of the most prominent DC properties. But the fans alluded to? Those who gush and/or act as apologists for this stunt are not "fans". And whether or not it happens in this story, it's the writer, Zdarsky, who's making changes, not the character "coming out".
According to Yahoo! News, Issue #5 of Batman: The Night by Chip Zdarsky, Carmine Di Giandomenico, Ivan Plascencia, and Pat Brosseau, a scene takes place during which Bruce Wayne, after a failed mission, leans in for a kiss with his fellow trainee Anton but is “interrupted by Avery Oblonsky, the ex-KGB agent training them.”
[...] Screen Rant also points out that this moment arises after “flirty interactions between the Dark Knight and John Constantine in last week's Batman: Urban Legends,” further making the case for fans' speculations.
And all this coming shortly after the new movie starring Robert Pattinson came out, just to show how badly DC's editors, led as they are by Marie Javins, want to embarrass the property as badly as they are now with their woke themes. Anybody who's truly a Bat-fan should distance themselves from DC with the way they're going now, just as Super-fans should too, after they foisted the same themes upon the recently created Jon Kent. This virtue signaling is not how to market entertainment.
Labels: Batman, dc comics, golden calf of LGBT, moonbat writers, msm propaganda, politics
Speaking of desecrating Batman, Gary Whitta (you might remember him from when Rogue One was released, where he alongside Chris Weitz took to Twitter and caused a controversy where they called the Empire a White Supremacist organization and the Rebels a multicultural group led by brave women around the same time Donald Trump was elected) wrote a comic involving the Caped Crusader and... well, let's just say he DEFINITELY doesn't come out looking at all good regarding this. Long story short, he ditches Gotham when BLM and Antifa torch the buildings, and implies that insurance would take care of everything:
https://boundingintocomics.com/2022/05/26/batman-flees-antifa-and-black-lives-matter-style-riots-in-new-comic-these-places-all-have-insurance-not-my-job-to-protect-their-profit-margins/
Posted by eotness | 3:59 AM
Thanks, I'm going to write about this as soon as I can.
Posted by Avi Green | 8:51 AM
Thanks, and while you're at it, there's another article you might want to focus on. As Winnie the Pooh is going to be entering the public domain in the future, while it's good Disney won't rape it now, the bad news is that there's now some really sick people who would relish at the opportunity to exploit public domain to create a genuinely sick take on a beloved children's book character. This guy's one of them, turning the worlds' most popular storybook bear into essentially Jason Voorhees in the movie Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey. And he specifically decided to make the film precisely BECAUSE the character was about to be released into the public domain:
https://boundingintocomics.com/2022/05/27/new-horror-film-winnie-the-pooh-blood-and-honey-turns-the-childrens-character-into-a-cold-blooded-slasher-villain/
Posted by eotness | 10:08 AM