« Home | Why screenwriter Rylend Grant turned to writing gr... » | Something's pretty fishy about the way Three Joker... » | Rich Johnston serves as apologist for an anti-Isra... » | Polygon makes a case for Superman's relevancy » | Another example of Marvel's attacks on whites » | Daniel Kibblesmith went overboard » | The influences of a Greensboro comics writer » | Was there racism at DC/Marvel offices in the past ... » | Aubrey Sitterson still retains his far-left politics » | Newsarama's awkward list of best female heroines » 

Thursday, November 05, 2020 

Newsarama gushes over Kitty Pryde's change to bisexual

Surprise, surprise: Games Radar/Newsarama is going out of their minds over Kitty Pryde's newly established status as bisexual, telling us it all "matters", and that it's "canon":
When fans list their favorite X-Men, Kitty Pryde is a frequent character that shows up. But why do people love her so much? She's never been a focused star of the X-Men film franchise, she isn't an Avenger, and she's never had her own solo ongoing series.

For the very reasons Kitty Pryde hasn't found mainstream success (whatever that means) is why so many comic book readers connect to her – she's relatable. Once the youngest mutant on the X-Men team, Kitty's journey is the rare occurrence in comic books where readers saw a character grow up. But what may be the most relatable aspect of her character is her continuous search for self.
You know why she may not have been put to much use in mainstream? The sad answer is because of her Jewish/Israeli ancestry. Something which curiously doesn't come up in this puff piece. Has it ever occurred that, despite seeming recognition of such a status in public, the entertainment industry doesn't have the courage to give a character a boost based on that? Well unfortunately, it's entirely possible this is why, and the site writer's refusal to bring it up decidedly proves it. Just look at the following:
Kitty Pryde's struggle with identity has been a core theme of her character, from her questionable fashion choices to the difficulty of her picking a simple codename, but also on a subtextual level – her sexuality. Kitty's character was first introduced in the '80s, during the height of the AIDS epidemic. There was a lack of LGBTQA+ representation in all media (not just comics), with superhero comic books relying on subtextual storytelling for any type of representation.

And, oh boy, was Kitty the queen of subtextual storytelling: flirtatious conversations with her female friends, hugs with Rachel Summers that lasted a bit too long, and tickle fights with Illyana Rasputin. Some may even go as far to say it was queerbaiting – giving just enough to make queer fans 'happy' without actually having to deliver on any real representation.

In a 2016 interview with Jay & Miles X-Plain the X-Men, Claremont even mentions that Kitty's true love was always intended to be Rachel Summers, and this isn't the only place he's been vocal about her bisexuality – leaving more subtextual moments in both the X-Men: The End and Mekanix limited series.
I'm honestly disappointed Claremont's made himself into such a tool for these clowns, but then, as he was reaching the end of his original run for nearly 15 years on X-Men and its spinoffs, his storytelling became more hit-or-miss, and when he came back to write it at the time the 2000 movie was debuting, it didn't feel like his book anymore, and the X-treme X-Men spinoff he wrote circa 2001-05 was hardly a masterpiece. His recent succumbing to political correctness is typical of some scribes in this modern era, who don't have what it takes to leave these ideologies at the door. And it only gets worse with this:
Kitty's return in Marauders #12 highlights some of her most important relationships and *cough* her potential love interests. From riding horses into the sunset with Emma Frost, Illyana lunging to embrace Kitty as a song about a secret love affair plays as ambiance, and, of course, some classic longing looks between Rachel and Kitty, all of the subtext becomes text and leads to the issue's monumental moment: she kisses a girl.
Even if Emma left the employ of the Hellfire Club and reformed a decade after her debut, winning Kitty's newfound trust as a result after they originally got off on the wrong foot in 1980, this is mighty ludicrous and atrociously oozy. Besides, isn't Emma much older than her? This treacle runs the risk of making it sound like there was a lesbian affair between an older woman and an underaged teen girl. And the truly disgusting thing is that the people writing these puff pieces are surely the same ones who'd tear down on older stories involving older men/younger women affairs, like Ben Grimm's young aunt Petunia marrying his older uncle in Fantastic Four, Donna Troy's love and marriage to college professor Terry Long in New Teen Titans, and even James MacDonald Hudson's marriage to the younger Heather MacNeil in Alpha Flight, whom he first met when she was a month before turning 18, and their affair only really began after she did. It's hypocrisy at its most offensive, coming from "moralists" who lost their moral compass for the sake of PC. Some of what appeared in older X-Men tales may have been subtextual, but that doesn't immediately prove it was intended to imply what these SJWs want it to.
A beat that happens because Kitty on countless occasions in the past five-plus years had to ask herself 'who am I?' and she was tired of running away from the answer. Why was her romantic timing with Star-Lord never right? Why did she leave Colossus at the altar? Why is she an X-Men on a pirate ship with finger tattoos working for the 'enemy'? Kitty was trying to find her authentic self, and her near-death experience helped her achieve it. Her moments with all those Peters were valid (that's the definition of bisexuality), but she needed to figure herself out before she could accept love from a man or a woman.

Following Marauders #12, the character, the title, and the entire X-Men line were whisked off to a two-month-long crossover event titled 'X of Swords,' leaving little chance for Kitty Pryde's 'coming out' moment to sink in, but readers are looking for follow-up later this year.

With so few bisexual characters in superhero comic books (and even fewer bisexual coming out stories), it makes it that much more important for Kitty Pryde's bisexuality to continue to be visible.
But not her Israeli ancestry, right? One of the people in the comments section summed it up with the following:
this article is well-written one-sided. Not a SINGLE mention of her religion, her being Jewish. Newsarama just deicded to NOT mention it at all as if it never existed. And trying to say there are FEW bisexual comic characters? REALLY? In X-books alone you have 12 (Elizabeth Braddock, Anole, Karma, Shatterstar, Rictor, Prodigy, Daken, Mysqiue, Destiny, Benjamin Deeds, Yukio, Stacy X), marvel has 40 characters at least and that's just in the 616 universe.

I got no problem with bisexual characters like Betsy, Anole, Karma, etc. but when you erase a persons beliefs to meet a quota? that's just wrong.

I ask you how many JEWISH characters are there represented in the X-books? Kitty & Magneto. How many of them practice Judaism? Just Kitty. So tell me what would happen if you took a bixesual character and changed them to be straight with a jewish faith? A angry-written article is what we would get. Thanks newsarama.
I fully agree here that the chances Newsarama and others of their ilk would appreciate emphasis on a Jewish background is very slim, and if they didn't do so before, there's no chance they will now. If a writer auditioned a story emphasizing Kitty's Jewish background and whether she's an observant Judaist of any sect, it's almost a foregone conclusion it would be watered down horribly by editorial, or rejected altogether, in contrast to this oh-so important moment in modern history, based on bisexuality.

And yet, it's beginning to look like this was the reason for a marriage between Kitty and Colossus not happening - because they think it's acceptable to reject the opposite sex, as would seem to be the setup in the pseudo-event of 2018. To think J. Scott Campbell would have a variant cover wasted on it, that's why it's all the more sad.

Labels: , , , , ,

Or does not mentioning her religion all the time just mean that she is accepted for who she is? It would be pretty weird if she was always billed as the Jewish X-man, as if she was only a token character.

Wouldn't it be horrible if Disney's business cratered due to C19 and they had to sell off the Marvel IP to raise funds? Particularly as they've done everything possible to devalue it for the last 5 years.

Post a Comment

About me

  • I'm Avi Green
  • From Jerusalem, Israel
  • I was born in Pennsylvania in 1974, and moved to Israel in 1983. I also enjoyed reading a lot of comics when I was young, the first being Fantastic Four. I maintain a strong belief in the public's right to knowledge and accuracy in facts. I like to think of myself as a conservative-style version of Clark Kent. I don't expect to be perfect at the job, but I do my best.
My profile

Archives

Links

  • avigreen2002@yahoo.com
  • Fansites I Created

  • Hawkfan
  • The Greatest Thing on Earth!
  • The Outer Observatory
  • Earth's Mightiest Heroines
  • The Co-Stars Primer
  • Comic book websites (open menu)

    Comic book weblogs (open menu)

    Writers and Artists (open menu)

    Video commentators (open menu)

    Miscellanous links (open menu)

  • W3 Counter stats
  • Click here to see website statistics
  • blog directory Bloggeries Blog Directory Entertainment Blogs
    Entertainment blog TopOfBlogs View My Stats Blog Directory & Search engine blog directory eXTReMe Tracker Locations of visitors to this page  

    This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

    make money online blogger templates

Older Posts Newer Posts

The Four Color Media Monitor is powered by Blogspot and Gecko & Fly.
No part of the content or the blog may be reproduced without prior written permission.
Join the Google Adsense program and learn how to make money online.