Behold: this is all these SJWs care about
8 Comments Published by Avi Green on Sunday, June 28, 2015 at 9:33 PM.
Watching people on the news argue about yesterday's ruling.
Simple solution if gay marriage offends you:
YOU shouldn't get gay married.
Done
— Dan Slott (@DanSlott) June 27, 2015And you shouldn't be pushing this propaganda on people who don't approve at all costs. Especially not on families who could find it hard to explain to their children just how this is supposed to be fully justified or even "normal".
Scalia's dissent reads like a long Breitbart message board post.
— Mark Waid (@MarkWaid) June 25, 2015Waid's tweet reads like somebody who's a gleeful cynic, celebrating how this news grates upon conservatives and other dissenters. I wouldn't be surprised if he's an atheist, and if he's got no problem with what this ruling could lead to. He probably doesn't even care about the bad impact it could have for children.
Changed my Profile Pic. Love. To everyone! pic.twitter.com/QVAsty7nv9
— GeneHa (@GeneHa) June 28, 2015Except to the right wing and families, you can be sure. What a head-shaker.
And the Supreme Court gets another one right! Marriage equality, baby! Wooot!
— Kurt Busiek (@KurtBusiek) June 26, 2015More like Marxist "equality", I'd say.
“@zeuscomics: We have our license! pic.twitter.com/4P2aLNcoAf”
WHAT? THAT IS AWESOME AND LOOK WHO IS WITH YOU!
— GAIL SIMONE (@GailSimone) June 27, 2015I find myself paying close attention to which companies have commented in support of marriage equality today. They'll have my business.
— GAIL SIMONE (@GailSimone) June 27, 2015I'm not sure Simone should get mine or your business if this is what she's going to go out of her way to support. Not for her creator-owned work anyway.
I probably shouldn't make fun of people who are vitriolic about gay marriage, health care and Confederate flags. BUT YOU MAKE IT SO EASY.
— Ron Marz (@ronmarz) June 27, 2015I think he's got that a bit backwards. People like him make it so easy to point out how rabid their left-wing politics are, and how disrespectful they are to anybody disagreeing with them.
Remember that time the gay community went out of it's way to harm your straight life?
Me neither.
— Patch Zircher (@PatrickZircher) June 27, 2015I'm proud our country took a step toward including people--we have a ways to go, with race & gender equality, but it's the right direction.
— Patch Zircher (@PatrickZircher) June 27, 2015Nope. Not if it costs taxpayers' money, I'm afraid. Perhaps he might want to check this report about homosexuality being taught in a public school before claiming it's impossible. Also see this one.
— Judd Winick. (@JuddWinick) June 26, 2015No surprise this man is such a SJW.
It's important to remember not only that #lovewins today, but #dignitywins.
— Cully Hamner (@CullyHamner) June 26, 2015What dignity do ultra-leftist SJWs have? Practically none. They sure don't have respect for Judeo-Christian values, that's for sure.
Given the majority of Americans already accept gay marriage I’m not sure what “true acceptance” he’s talking about http://t.co/JQwvxDMlna
— Gerry Conway (@gerryconway) June 26, 2015The only Americans who don’t accept gay marriage by now will probably never accept it, so why wait? http://t.co/JQwvxDMlna
— Gerry Conway (@gerryconway) June 26, 2015"Today’s Court Ruling, Though Expected, is Still Shocking – Especially for Those Who Grew Up LGBT in the U.S." https://t.co/RrRd9OZYzX
— Gerry Conway (@gerryconway) June 26, 2015Forget Scalia! Justice Roberts Is a Total Marriage Moron http://t.co/xssXIA6wsu
— Gerry Conway (@gerryconway) June 26, 2015Sometimes I get the feeling Conway is a moron. And that he's been so for many years.
❤️💛💚💙💜💗 (Emoji, you need an orange heart.) https://t.co/b8P5Dnguwd
— Geoff Johns (@geoffjohns) June 26, 2015Notice the avatar he's currently using too? If it weren't obvious he was a leftist before, it is now.
And these are all people who don't seem particularly concerned about the plight of gays and lesbians under Islam and in Muslim countries. I think they're only voicing their support for the justices who favored this ruling at the supreme court so they can undermine the country that gives them the freedom to disagree with them. The court's ruling is all they seem to care about. I didn't even spot any commenting on the verdict delivered against Dzhokhar Tsarnaev this past week. Their concerns are pretty narrow.
Labels: dreadful artists, Europe and Asia, islam and jihad, moonbat artists, moonbat writers, politics, terrorism
A: What does the average American care about what happens overseas?
B: You are in the Middle East: despite popular belief, USA's laws DON'T apply to all countries.
C: It's a ruling, it can be challenged with loopholes or appeals.
D: How many people out there actually believe in causes like "gay marriage" or "tax reform" and aren't going along just for the heck of it?
E: Give it 5-10 years to see what effects will happen, it's not like this is one of those sudden shifts in economy policies!
F: Hasn't anyone thought about the legal and technical problems that gay marriages now suffer like their straight marriage brethren like taxes or divorce?
Add Ty Templeton to the list. I didn't realize how much of a leftist he was until I saw his website tonight:
https://tytempletonart.wordpress.com/2015/06/27/again-with-the-speeches-bun-toons/
Nice to know the comic set love their priorities. But what about their Muslim readers, wonder if they'll be happy with their comic book people as presented here.
You almost have to admire the epic smugness, as when the Right wins, it's rarely this smug. And I'll die a happy man if I never see a rainbow graphic again.
Meh. Gay marriage was inevitable, and if I may, I had a (long) blog history fairly correctly pointing out how it would happen: http://colossus.mu.nu/archives/357566.php
;-)
Drag: The Supreme Court ruled. There ARE NO further appeals. The only way to circumvent their ruling is to pass a constitutional amendment, and that won't happen.
KM's got a good question: Maybe some of those creators can ask G. Willow Wilson to serve as a catalyst for rainbows in the mid-east.
I wonder if G. Willow Wilson really practices any of the tenets of Islam (besides wearing a scarf), or if she adopts that pose so she can accuse anyone who disagrees with her about anything of "Islamophobia."
There may be synagogues and Christian churches losing their tax exemptions if they refuse to sanction gay marriage. I wonder if the government would take the same action against Muslim mosques?
It would be fun if a gay couple went to a mosque and demanded that the imam perform their wedding ceremony. Or if they went to a Muslim-owned bakery and tried to hire the baker to make a gay-themed wedding cake. And then sued when they were refused. Then the tolerant Progressives could take sides in the ensuing controversy, and could accuse each other of "homophobia" and "Islamophobia."
I'd take TC's bet. And for everyone saying how primitive IS or Muslims are, the former know how to use social media way more effective than we do and the latter caught on to the victimology racket very well. As pointed out by Steyn.
And 50 years, if the Muslims do succeed into making Sharia Law here, this argument will be moot, anyway.
This comment has been removed by the author.
"No surprise this man is such a SJW." Obviously. He was on a reality show with a gay guy who died of AIDS and tried to push the lie that it's just as likely for non-promiscuous straight people to get it with his Mia Dearden story. His Red Hood story was good though.
What else is the Middle East good for besides oil, hostile natives, terrorism, religious/historic artifacts/buildings, idiotic debates based on the previously listed items, and sand?
Also, what else does ISIL do besides terrorism, like economic plans or rebuilding efforts to their people?
By the by, am I the only one having an image of USA and other countries being buddy-buddy with all those hostile countries and then sticking a knife in the back when they least expect it?