The Four Color Media Monitor

Because if we're going to try and stop the misuse of our favorite comics and their protagonists by the companies that write and publish them, we've got to see what both the printed and online comics news is doing wrong. This blog focuses on both the good and the bad, the newspaper media and the online websites. Unabashedly. Unapologetically. Scanning the media for what's being done right and what's being done wrong.


Nashua Telegraph sugarcoats DC relaunch

In this Nashua Telegraph article, they fawn over DC's relaunch, calling it the story of the year:
As we look back on 2011, there is little doubt what comic-book story was #1: DC’s re-launch of its entire superhero universe in September.

Even in retrospect it’s hard to believe they did it. Never before has any publisher – perhaps any business – canceled its major product line and started it over from scratch. Especially when you consider that “Detective Comics” – for which DC Comics took its name – had an unbroken run back to 1937, and that “Action Comics” had the highest numbering of any current American comic book (#904). Those little pieces of history are now gone, as even those two venerable books were re-started at #1 in September.
Oh, it's not so hard to believe they did it at all. Anything for the sake of sales and publicity, that's what both DC and Marvel are all about today. But all from scratch? That's an exaggeration, I'm afraid. The recent continuities of Batman and Green Lantern, for example, have remained in place.
You can imagine the sheer hysteria that gripped comics fandom when “The New 52” titles were announced in May. We fans couldn’t comprehend why DC would take such a risky step. We absolutely freaked out. “What was DC afraid of?” we wailed, for we were certain that only the threat of imminent demise could force such a move. Was digital destroying the print market? Had Warner Bros. given its comic-book arm an ultimatum? Was this the last gasp of a dying industry? Since nobody believed DC’s official reasons for doing it – vague, unconvincing corporate-speak that I have already forgotten – the rumors ran wild.

And it worked.

All of The New 52 titles sold out in September, and DC was #1 with a bullet. In October, it was a rout: DC’s share of dollar sales was 13 percent higher than arch-rival Marvel’s, and DC had 51 percent of the entire industry in units sold!

Best of all, the rising tide has begun lifting all boats. DC may be enjoying the lion’s share of the market pie, but their wild gamble has also made it a bigger pie for everyone. Sales of comics are up across the board, putting a lot of grateful comic shops thoroughly in the black.
But for how long? 200,000 for Justice League is far from a whopping sales number, and those numbers have since begun their not too surprising decline, as it becomes apparent that this is just more publicity stunt material with more editorial mandate involved than genuine urge to entertain anyone. The article doesn't even give any clear numbers of sales, nor does it tell if said sales numbers are even holding steady.

And telling everybody that the audience was in the throes of hysteria sounds insulting and sensationalistic, and trivializes any legitimate troubles they may have with these steps. As it so happens, we do understand why DC was taking such a risky step - to serve as a survival tactic for Dan DiDio, who's still basically in charge even after Bob Harras took over his EIC position.

At the end of the article, it says:
One last big story is the huge growth of digital comics in 2011. All of the major publishers are moving to same-day release of print and digital comics, with Marvel bringing up the rear in February 2012. This may turn out to be the biggest story of 2011 in the end, but for now all we can say is “to be continued.”
And that may soon have to be changed to "concluded", when sales of printed books slump down again. That aside, if DC's downplay of digital products is any suggestion, digital items aren't making waves as big as the mainstream press must want us to think.

Labels: , ,

1 Responses to “Nashua Telegraph sugarcoats DC relaunch”

  1. # Anonymous Anonymous

    Andrew A. Smith aka Captain Comics sugarcoats everything about the comic industry these days. He (and so many other comics "reporters" in the MSM) never have the guts to ask tough questions, such as why a reboot was necessary in the first place. Or why we're bombarded by endless, repetitive crossovers.

    CP  

Post a Comment


Web This Blog

Archives

Links

  • avigreen2002@yahoo.com
  • Fansites I Created

  • Hawkfan
  • The Greatest Thing on Earth!
  • The Outer Observatory
  • Earth's Mightiest Heroines
  • The Co-Stars Primer
  • Realtime Website Traffic

    Comic book websites (open menu)

    Comic book weblogs (open menu)

    Writers and Artists (open menu)

    Video commentators (open menu)

    Miscellanous links (open menu)

  • W3 Counter stats
  • Webhostingcounter stats
  • Bio Link page
  • Blog Hub
  • Bloggernow
  • Bloggeries Blog Directory View My Stats stats counter
    stats counter visitors by country counter
    flag counter world map hits counter
    map counter eXTReMe Tracker   world map hits counter
    Visitor Counter

    Pflegevorsorge click here

    Flag Counter Free Global Counter Free Hit Counters
    Free Web Counter Locations of Site Visitors  Statistics


XML

Powered by Blogger

make money online blogger templates



© 2006 The Four Color Media Monitor | Blogger Templates by GeckoandFly.
No part of the content or the blog may be reproduced without prior written permission.
Learn how to make money online | First Aid and Health Information at Medical Health



Flag Counter

track people
webpage logs
Flag Counter