I looked around Twitter to see what any of the most biased writers and artists had to say following Dan DiDio's dismissal from DC by Time Warner/AT&T. Here's a starting example of somebody bad who was quite pleased with his leadership:
There you have it: DiDio, the social justice advocate's best ally. Instead of reserving his far-left story ideas for his own separate projects, Russell is a writer who's just got to jam them
into established properties, no matter how badly it sullies them as a result. And let's not forget how, soon after Identity Crisis, DC under DiDio got around to introducing race-swapped replacements for Atom, Firestorm and Blue Beetle, and possibly a gender-swapped Manhunter, to show how their recent steps weren't entirely new. Now, here's another example, no more surprising than the first:
I think at this point, we can recognize it's just a lot of hot air to claim DiDio's an enthusiast for the medium, or that he ever helped older creators behind the scenes. He certainly didn't help
Dwayne McDuffie, whom he fired over a thoughtcrime, and Chuck Dixon was largely blacklisted from DC's employ to boot for a time. And if DiDio did help anybody, it was just "consensus-building" to obscure his gravest errors, like
the repellent miniseries the above disgrace penned in 2004. That Meltzer would be lauding DiDio is no shock at all. Here's more comments that shouldn't be a surprise either:
It figures Bendis would praise him, so soon after DiDio hired him to ruin the Superman franchise for starters, and the Legion by extension. And I guess, despite any alleged dislike Quesada and DiDio had for each other, which is surely doubtful at this point, given the badness both contributed to the properties they oversaw, it's no shock Quesada would be fawning over his resume, which is as distasteful as the former Marvel EIC's. Here's still several more:
My my, we have King gushing over DiDio, all because he gave him the chance
to victimize the Titans and Wally West, and Jurgens has long been a very pretentious scribe, with only so many
bad steps in his resume that forces one to take his contributions to comicdom with a grain of salt. Simone sounds like an apologist, and come to think of it, she is. That's what Palmiotti and Capullo are doing too.
Interestingly enough, one artist/writer who took a somewhat opposite path was, of all people, Rob Liefeld:
You have to wonder why the crummiest artist in the biz is the one who can make at least a modicum of sense, and not take as politically correct a path as the others are. Obviously, Liefeld's resentful over possible fallouts he had with DiDio's staff, but it doesn't change the fact Liefeld is still an extraordinarily dull illustrator, and it's regrettable IDW recently
assigned him to draw a GI Joe/Snake Eyes book, where signs of his awkwardness do show through, like one panel where SE looks wide, if not truly fat.
And seriously, isn't that an understatement to say DiDio was "holding back" DC? It was worse than that, he was destroying much of what made the creations work, and made it no secret he believed superheroes and their co-stars shouldn't have happy lives. Put another way, he was editorially mandating that the entire line follow his sick, twisted ideas of what superhero and science fiction tales should be like.
Now, since we're on the subject, here's some
news from the Science Fiction website about DiDio's dismissal, which confirms he was indeed fired, and deservedly so:
One thing that has been confirmed is that DiDio was fired. Bleeding Cool, who first broke the news, reports that he was let go at 10:30 a.m. PST, and he left the publisher’s building in Burbank immediately. DiDio and Lee were expected to appear at the ComicPro expo for retailers on Saturday, but neither showed up. DC did not turn up for its one-hour scheduled presentation, but representatives Vince Letterio and Adam Phillips appeared later for a 12-minute discussion.
Comic book professionals took to social media to shower DiDio with praise. Now, DiDio was a divisive figure and he was not universally liked, but it seems that bygones were bygones. One of the creators that he had reportedly clashed with was ‘Batman’ writer Scott Snyder, but Snyder only had nice things to say, although he did acknowledge that they had had “nuclear fights.”
I get the feeling they're making it sound as though DiDio was only considered a problem on the inside, rather than the outside, among fandom proper. If that's what they're implying, it's just like them to avoid the meatier issues.
Now, as for the next laughable crossover originally planned under DiDio, I don't expect the company to close down if it's a failure (though it'd certainly deserve to, seeing how superfluous these events have become), but here's what the site's saying about that:
Generation Five/5G basically resets DC’s 80-year continuity to the way it always was pre-“Crisis on Infinite Earths” and every other reboot that followed, but with a few changes, like Wonder Woman being the first superhero having appeared in World War I like she did in the movie. That was technically before DC Comics existed. The first National Periodicals book, ‘More Fun Comics’ began in 1935. But beyond that, Superman made his debut in 1938, when ‘Action Comics’ #1 was published, and the rest of publishing history is DC’s actual history. The plan is to replace Superman, Wonder Woman, Batman and everyone else with newer younger people taking over those roles.
Let's see if I have this right. They're supposedly going to erase 30-plus years of stories (and it's rather obvious that wouldn't hold, seeing what chaos they become with their continuity anyway), presumably restore the multiverse represented primarily by Earth 1 and 2, and yet they intend to replace - long or short term - much of their established leads with a different cast of characters who, if recent mainstream examples say anything, will be different races, sexual orientations and genders? Well, I don't see why we should give such a move any backing regardless, since, no matter what we thought of the pre-Crisis multiverse, most fans at this point certainly never asked for this replacement mentality, and past experience should be enough to teach "be careful what you wish for"; exactly why less today care about whether the multiverse would be restored to modern pseudo-continuity. I do think what could be done is clear away at least 2 decades or so of what passed for "continuity" under DiDio's regime, along with anything else that didn't work out previously, but assuming a successor would be willing to do that remains to be seen, and isn't guaranteed to ensure success, if they don't drop all the social justice pandering, sensationalized violence that became common for years, among other embarrassments since the turn of the century.
DiDio may have left (and interesting how he departed so quickly, even if he was ordered to clean out his desk before he exited the building), but the heavy damage he left behind is still apparent, and it's not going to be cured in a fortnight, assuming anybody at DC really wants to do it at all.
Labels: bad editors, dc comics, licensed products, misogyny and racism, moonbat artists, moonbat writers, msm propaganda, politics, violence
